Re: Thoughts on the Services Offered

We use all of them and highly recommend them On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 4:07 PM Mann, Jason via NANOG wrote: > Anyone using the below or any plus/negatives for the using these services? > > > > Community Services | Team Cymru (team-cymru.com) > > >

Re: Thoughts on the Services Offered

we use all 3 and love them On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:10 PM Mann, Jason via NANOG wrote: > Anyone using the below or any plus/negatives for the using these services? > > > > Community Services | Team Cymru (team-cymru.com) > > >Nimbus Threat Moni

Re: Thoughts On Cheap Chinese xDSL Testers

There are some downsides with the Colt-250+ units (as I have one almost daily to do installs for a CLEC). 1. The Colts require 4 high amperage AA batteries. I used to purchase Duracell Ultra batteries which worked, but life span was a couple of weeks to maybe a month and now I cannot seem to find

Re: Thoughts On Cheap Chinese xDSL Testers

We have some sunrise telecom test set's which we don't use any more. Will be willing the sell them, let me know off list. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.n

Re: Thoughts On Cheap Chinese xDSL Testers

The Westel A90-750045-07 Frontier branded DSL router has some amazing DSL status screens if you dig in the menu deep enough. I always kept one in the truck when I was doing some service work. Check the local Goodwill/Value Village. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 On Mon, Jun 29

RE: Thoughts On Cheap Chinese xDSL Testers

The local ILEC (Verizon) use Colt 250+.  They are pretty cool.  They do not do layer 3 like the meter you referenced. I'm actually looking for a cost-effective meter that does ADSL+ / VDSL2 / e.SHDSL.  it's easy to find one that does the first two, but not all three. Original message --

Re: thoughts?

On 5/28/2010 06:58, Bruce Williams wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:41 AM, George Bonser wrote: > >> >> Where does one get an IP address degree? >> >> >> > > The same place anything of value is found - Wall St. > > They are creating CIPO's - Collateralized IP Obligations. They will > create

Re: thoughts?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:41 AM, George Bonser wrote: > > Where does one get an IP address degree? > > > The same place anything of value is found - Wall St. They are creating CIPO's - Collateralized IP Obligations. They will create a market so people "borrow" IP addresses, the people who loan

Re: thoughts?

On 27.05 07:10, Dorn Hetzel wrote: > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2 Certainly no news for people on this list I would hope. ;-) My objective when talking to reporters who write for the *business* section is to project that mere awareness is not good enou

Re: thoughts?

On 5/27/10, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:46:47 PDT, George Bonser said: >> > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html >> Somebody should do something! > > We started deploying IPv6 in testbed mode on our production network in 1997, > so we're wa

Re: thoughts?

On 5/27/2010 13:09, Larry Sheldon wrote: > We are missing the point. > > The Administration will, as it has so ably done in the Carbon Dioxide > emergency, declare the the IP layer a hazardous zone and institute taxes > to make the costs skyrocket, thereby reducing usage. If some one from the gov

RE: thoughts?

d so much about At 12:41 PM 5/27/2010, you wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Roy > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:59 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: thoughts? > > On 5/27/2010 8:46 AM, George Bonser wrote: > >> -Original Message- >

Re: thoughts?

We are missing the point. The Administration will, as it has so ably done in the Carbon Dioxide emergency, declare the the IP layer a hazardous zone and institute taxes to make the costs skyrocket, thereby reducing usage. [Note to list nannies: I know. I had stopped. I let several beautiful op

RE: thoughts?

> -Original Message- > From: Charles Bronson [mailto:packetg...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:30 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: thoughts? > > I'm not sure what these "IP Addresses" are that they speak of. But > can&#

Re: thoughts?

On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:46:47 PDT, George Bonser said: > > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html > Somebody should do something! We started deploying IPv6 in testbed mode on our production network in 1997, so we're waiting for the rest of you slackers to get caught up.

RE: thoughts?

> -Original Message- > From: Roy > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:59 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: thoughts? > > On 5/27/2010 8:46 AM, George Bonser wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Dorn Hetzel > >> Sen

Re: thoughts?

On 5/27/2010 8:46 AM, George Bonser wrote: -Original Message- From: Dorn Hetzel Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:11 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: thoughts? http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt= T2 Somebody should do something!

RE: thoughts?

> -Original Message- > From: Dorn Hetzel > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:11 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: thoughts? > > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt= > T2 Somebody should do something!

Re: thoughts?

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:07 AM, James Bensley wrote: > On 27 May 2010 12:10, Dorn Hetzel wrote: >> http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2 > > Disgraceful scaremongery, CCN should be ashamed. Why should CNN be ashamed? They're quoting a thoroughly bone-headed s

Re: thoughts?

On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:06:26 EDT, Dorn Hetzel said: > Perhaps my brevity got the better of me. I should have said something like > "any thoughts on whether the migration of this 'news' into the 'mainstream' > media will eventually result in some sort of y2k like 'panic' and will that > 'panic', if

RE: thoughts?

If the mainstream can sell more papers/get more viewers then in all likelyhood, yes. From: Dorn Hetzel [dhet...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 May 2010 14:06 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: thoughts? Perhaps my brevity got the better of me. I should have said somethin

Re: thoughts?

On 5/27/2010 07:30, Charles Bronson wrote: >> Message: 6 > >> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 07:10:54 -0400 From: Dorn Hetzel >> Subject: thoughts? To: nanog@nanog.org >> Message-ID: >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/inde

Re: thoughts?

> I'm not sure what these "IP Addresses" are that they speak of. But can't we > have the government just print more? We have to kick ICANN out of the picture and let the UN and ITU figure what to do ...

Re: thoughts?

> Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 07:10:54 -0400 > From: Dorn Hetzel > Subject: thoughts? > To: nanog@nanog.org > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2 I'm not sure what these "IP Addre

Re: thoughts?

On 5/27/2010 07:07, James Bensley wrote: > Disgraceful scaremongery, CCN should be ashamed. CNN too. Does anybody take them seriously? Watch them? -- Somebody should have said: A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Freedom under a constitutional republic is a

Re: thoughts?

On 5/27/2010 06:40, Eric Van Tol wrote: > In other news, I understand that the Americans have won their > independence . Have we? -- Somebody should have said: A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb

Re: thoughts?

On 5/27/2010 06:10, Dorn Hetzel wrote: > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2 I am guessing that once the Obama Administration has taken control of this public utility, all of the problems will be resolved. I for one will be afraid to use it. -- Somebody s

Re: thoughts?

On 27 May 2010 12:10, Dorn Hetzel wrote: > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2 > Disgraceful scaremongery, CCN should be ashamed. -- Regards, James. http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ - There are only 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand trina

Re: thoughts?

> I like the personal title: > "Daniel Karrenberg, IP address expert" humility is always touching

RE: thoughts?

I like the personal title: "Daniel Karrenberg, IP address expert" From: Dorn Hetzel [dhet...@gmail.com] Sent: 27 May 2010 12:10 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: thoughts? http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2

Re: thoughts?

> In other news, I understand that the Americans have won their independence > from England?  Did anyone else know this? Is Texas still part of Mexico ? Don't know how to fill the ARIN forms ... -J

Re: thoughts?

Not any different then when Bob Metcalf predicted the Internet would melt down in the late 1990's and looked like a fool when it never happened! Even though I don't disagree IP4 address are rapidly getting used up, most of us on this list have the "know how" and tenacity to work through current

RE: thoughts?

> -Original Message- > From: Dorn Hetzel [mailto:dhet...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:11 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: thoughts? > > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2 Wow. A news story about the depletion of IP addresses? Shoc

Re: thoughts?

> http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html shocking news!

RE: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On Fri, June 29, 2007 4:35 pm, Neil J. McRae wrote: > I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters > names. Doesn't scale though :( Hence the rapid emergence of southpark-naming-draft-001.txt, flintstones-naming-draft-001.txt. Not to mention the grover / super-grov

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Cat Okita wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote: > > perhaps a decent other question is: Do I want to let the whole world know > > that router X with interfaces of type Y/Z/Q is located in 1-wilshire. > > > > I suppose on the one hand it's helpful to know that

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:15:30 PDT, you said: > Star Trek Federation Starships... they seem to invent more daily, so no > problems running out. If your DNS is RFC3490-enabled, you can go for the Klingon and Romulan ships too. Particularly handy if you're into security through obscurity. :) pgp

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

> If you have more routers than muppets, you have a problem. More muppets than routers is also a problem brandon

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:35:09 BST, "Neil J. McRae" said: I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters names. This only works in small shops. If you have more routers than muppets, you have a problem. Had a lab once where we named machines

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:35:09 BST, "Neil J. McRae" said: > I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters > names. This only works in small shops. If you have more routers than muppets, you have a problem. Had a lab once where we named machines after colors. That hit s

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > > Mythic Beasts Ltd, IIRC, names their machines after, uh, mythic > beasts. Which is consistent, but not especially useful.. perhaps a decent other question is: Do I want to let the whole world know that router X with interfaces of type Y/Z/Q i

RE: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street characters names.

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

Mythic Beasts Ltd, IIRC, names their machines after, uh, mythic beasts. Which is consistent, but not especially useful.. On 6/29/07, Leigh Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then you get some networks who name all the routers after cheeses or characters from bill and ben the flowerpot men. --

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

Then you get some networks who name all the routers after cheeses or characters from bill and ben the flowerpot men. -- Leigh Mark Tinka wrote: On Friday 15 June 2007 00:27, Olsen, Jason wrote: So, what practices do you folks follow? What are the up and downsides you encounter?

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On Friday 15 June 2007 00:27, Olsen, Jason wrote: > So, what practices do you folks follow? What are the up > and downsides you encounter? At my previous employer, we came up with a formula that we were happy with. For reverse DNS, it involves: * defining the interface * defining the device f

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On 14-Jun-2007, at 16:25, K K wrote: On 6/14/07, randal k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well. The issue of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a pain, but in my opinion, very necessary. I'm not entirely convi

Re: Thoughts on best practice for naming router infrastructure in DNS

On 6/14/07, randal k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This particular issue has been confounding to work around as well. The issue of constantly updating DNS to match the current topology is a pain, but in my opinion, very necessary. I'm not entirely convinced DNS records for every possible interfac