Re: RFC6598 in AWS?

2016-08-09 Thread Arlington Albertson
Thanks All, That was my understanding and research as well. Further, I have heard back directly from AWS and they have stated that while "yes" technically you can use it, you are prone to dns routing issues at the very least and should not expect everything to "just work" as it would with RFC1918.

Re: RFC6598 in AWS?

2016-08-08 Thread Matthieu Michaud
Hi, I fully agree with William and it's used in AWS infrastructure (VPC Internet GW IIRW). Best regards, On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:04 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Arlington Albertson > wrote: > > We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for th

Re: RFC6598 in AWS?

2016-08-05 Thread William Herrin
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Arlington Albertson wrote: > We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this > range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd experienced > using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS? Hi, The Carrier NAT space? The only difference b

RFC6598 in AWS?

2016-08-04 Thread Arlington Albertson
Hey folks, We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd experienced using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS? Thanks, -AA