Thanks for your detailed response John. Further comments inline.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:58 PM, John Curran wrote:
>
>
> So, Marcel, please allow me to turn the question around... Do you
> do you believe that there should be an RPKI Global Trust Anchor?
> Are you concerned about the pote
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 07:35:32 -0700, David Conrad said:
> You've apparently forgotten ICANN's time distortion field
Apple will almost certainly sue for infringing their reality distortion field
patents.
pgpmQRDRlLPdd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Barb,
You've apparently forgotten ICANN's time distortion field (which they'll be
inventing very shortly with the zillions of dollars they'll get from the new
gTLD program).
Err, yeah. 2006. Apologies -- typing on a cellphone can be distracting.
Regards,
-drc
On Aug 5, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Barb
On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> John,
>
> Thanks for the update! It's good to hear that progress is being made.
>
> Is there a place where the challenges and solutions are being discussed
> publicly? It's interesting that you raise DNSSEC in comparison since the two
> techno
> Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For
> political reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let
> ICANN/IANA play. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IANA as
> the root TA as recommended by the IAB, ICANN can't move forward.
the rirs should get
On 08/05/2013 06:58 PM, John Curran wrote:
On Aug 5, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcel Plug wrote:
Hi Nanog,
Does anyone have any inside information what may be happening in the effort
to have a single trust anchor for RPKI? Is ICANN still working on this?
If so is there any timeline or published in
On Aug 5, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcel Plug wrote:
> Hi Nanog,
>
> Does anyone have any inside information what may be happening in the effort
> to have a single trust anchor for RPKI? Is ICANN still working on this?
> If so is there any timeline or published info of any kind?
>
> Most of the inf
I think David meant 2006, not 1996.
-Barb Roseman
On 8/5/13 12:08 PM, "David Conrad" wrote:
>Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For
>political reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let
>ICANN/IANA play. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IA
Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For
political reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let ICANN/IANA
play. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IANA as the root TA as
recommended by the IAB, ICANN can't move forward.
Regards,
-drc
Mobi
NRO, the RIRs collective, is still working on this. It's listed as an open
action item since Q2 this CY at NRO Executive Council meetings:
http://www.nro.net
It's very unlikely that ICANN, which sees the NRO as it's address support
organization, will move on this before NRO does.
Rubens
On
Hi Nanog,
Does anyone have any inside information what may be happening in the effort
to have a single trust anchor for RPKI? Is ICANN still working on this?
If so is there any timeline or published info of any kind?
Most of the information i can find is about 2 years old.
Any links or info of
11 matches
Mail list logo
