On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:59:55 EDT, Andrew D Kirch said:
correct regarding firearms, without recognizing the basic right to
protect human life against criminals and despots, there are no other
rights (as a criminal and despot will take those rights with impunity).
Nice try, but the human right
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Well, the operational concern is... various governments have lately
shown a trend of disconnecting their countries' networks.
UN action is unlikely to help; they are too delayed, and there is
a lack of enforcement power - symbolic
On 6/6/2011 11:29 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Well, the operational concern is... various governments have lately
shown a trend of disconnecting their countries' networks.
UN action is unlikely to help; they are too delayed, and there
As much as I admire a good pointless wide-ranging political and human
rights flame-war, this is not even vaguely on topic for NANOG, and
everyone posting content here on this should be ashamed of themselves.
Free speech is a wonderful thing to have, but that is not a mandatory
requirement that
+1
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:33 AM, JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a significant difference between Internet access and Internet
service. I have access to the roads. But that doesn't magically get me
vehicular transportation from place A to place B. I need to buy a bus
- Original Message -
From: Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net
- PLONK
What a moron
admins? Warning? hello?
The admins need to warn a poster before a reader can put him in their
killfile? Wow; that would've been a handy rule for me back in '06. :-)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Well, the operational concern is...
that if you config an ACL you might be accused and brought to trial for
crimes against humanity.
-Hank
- Original Message -
From: Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Well, the operational concern is...
that if you config an ACL you might be accused and brought to trial
for
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediately
worried. I figure it warrants a discussion.
This is
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400
Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational implications, but every operator
On 6/5/2011 20:44, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400
Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
On 6/5/2011 20:44, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400
Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:48:56 EDT, Bryan Fields said:
On 6/5/2011 20:44, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400 Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net
wrote:
This is the same organization that says there is no basic human right to
keep
and bear arms. They have no standing to
On 6/5/2011 8:11 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediately
worried. I
On 6/5/2011 8:44 PM, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400
Bryan Fieldsbr...@bryanfields.net wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational
On 6/5/2011 10:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:48:56 EDT, Bryan Fields said:
On 6/5/2011 20:44, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400 Bryan Fieldsbr...@bryanfields.net wrote:
This is the same organization that says there is no basic human right to
On 05/06/11 9:59 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 6/5/2011 8:11 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational implications, but every
17 matches
Mail list logo
