Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

Good point, and important reminder to segment! None of this stuff is to be considered secure. Don’t feel bad, I left a box I’d just put a fresh slackware install on, this was perhaps 2000 or 1999 too keep in mind, anyway I left it running with a public IP and no root password. For an hour.

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

I want to love these, but I’ve had enough problems (3 bad units, one 8 port wiped it’s config and reset itself) causing outages, out of the 6 or so devices I’ve deployed, to ever use them in a critical production role. > On Apr 30, 2018, at 12:19 PM, Michel 'ic' Luczak

RE: Remote power cycle recommendations

nog-boun...@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Michel 'ic' Luczak Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 3:19 PM To: Andy Ringsmuth <a...@newslink.com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Remote power cycle recommendations If rack-mount is not a hard requirement, I wou

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

I had more or less the same experience with APC Masterswitches (fried a few of those) ;) + the included free backdoors and default admin passwords and write communities (I got my whole platform shutdown by someone once). I guess YMMV. > On 30 Apr 2018, at 21:49, Ben Cannon

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

If rack-mount is not a hard requirement, I would definitely look into Ubiquiti’s mPower range. You will find anything from a single socket (WiFi only) to a 6 socket PDU (WiFi and Ethernet, probably 8 sockets for US but I’m in Europe) with central management system (free) and detailed

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

On 04/30/2018 10:05 AM, William Herrin wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote: In particular, if at all possible, do not use the AP9606 era cards with the APCs. They are 10BaseT and take fragile to a whole new level. I usually have to manually force the

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote: > In particular, if at all possible, do not use the AP9606 era cards with the > APCs. They are 10BaseT and take fragile to a whole new level. I usually > have to manually force the port to 10 on the switch or put it on a

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

On 4/30/2018 9:46 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote: I've worked with APC, Synaccess, and a couple other brands of power controllers.  One constant:  the IP stack implementations tend to be a bit fragile.  This is not restricted to power controllers; I have a GPS NTP appliance that is affected by the

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

I've worked with APC, Synaccess, and a couple other brands of power controllers. One constant: the IP stack implementations tend to be a bit fragile. This is not restricted to power controllers; I have a GPS NTP appliance that is affected by the same sorts of things. I'll stick with APC

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

Various APC-rackmountable equipment. They come in all sorts of sizes and capacity. C13/C19, single breaker, dual feed/breaker, 19" rackmount, 0 HE vertical rackmount in the back. They have a web/snmp/telnet interface, separate account management, so very easy to control. Delayed power-on per

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

    Well I don't have all the model # handy, But we have a rack setup like this =D     2 feed 220v/30a going into:         2 x ATS AP4431 (an older version) feeding:             2 x AP7941 - Manageable                 21 x C13 - per AP - for the devices.                 2 x C19 going into:

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

Third for the APC9211, though I’ll add that you might “think” you only want one outlet now, but once you have the ability you will invariably want to control more ;) -Ben > On Apr 27, 2018, at 10:21 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote: > >> On 4/27/2018 11:03 AM, William Herrin wrote:

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

+1 for the APC kit :) alan

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

On 4/27/2018 11:03 AM, William Herrin wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: I’m sure many here are familiar with or using/have used devices to remotely power cycle equipment. I’m considering a Dataprobe iBoot-G2 and am curious if you’ve had

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

We use Synaccess https://www.synaccess-net.com/switched/

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: > I’m sure many here are familiar with or using/have used devices to remotely > power cycle equipment. I’m considering a Dataprobe iBoot-G2 and am curious if > you’ve had experience with it, or other recommendations. > >

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

We've used Digital Loggers products for nearly 15 years. https://www.digital-loggers.com/ Keefe On 4/27/2018 11:16 AM, Tim Pozar wrote: I have been picking up Server Technology CW-8H1-C20M boxes on eBay for about $45 to $65 each...

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

I have been picking up Server Technology CW-8H1-C20M boxes on eBay for about $45 to $65 each... https://www.ebay.com/itm/Server-Technology-CW-8H1-C20M-Switched-Power-Distribution-PDU-1U-Rackmount/332622720429 You can even get some recent firmware for these.

Remote power cycle recommendations

I’m sure many here are familiar with or using/have used devices to remotely power cycle equipment. I’m considering a Dataprobe iBoot-G2 and am curious if you’ve had experience with it, or other recommendations. I only need one outlet to be remotely power cycle-able. I have one piece of