- Original Message -
> From: "manning bill"
> Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread.
> If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD
> delegations, then:
>
> 1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected.
Am I missing something, or is the Finn
On 9/17/14 8:03 AM, manning bill wrote:
> Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread.
> If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD delegations,
> then:
>
> 1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected.
This is not actually true. We have prior art on co
well, apropos to point #2, the iso3166/ma includes representatives from
ten agencies, of which a certain 501(c)(3) originally in marina del rey,
now in los angeles, is included.
however, i can't imagine staff offering an opinion of record on the subject.
"ay" for "aye" would work for me.
-e
On
Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread.
If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD delegations, then:
1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected.
2_ ICANN has no say in the country code selected.
3_ The choice is up to an ISO committee.
See:
4 matches
Mail list logo
