PM
To: andr...@livejournalinc.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T
In article caj0nkqgy2x9pug26ccjchwdqsmy24f1u0rwmhf2poh2ehih...@mail.gmail.com,
Andreas Echavez andr...@livejournalinc.com wrote:
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks
...@livejournalinc.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T
In article
caj0nkqgy2x9pug26ccjchwdqsmy24f1u0rwmhf2poh2ehih...@mail.gmail.com,
Andreas Echavez andr...@livejournalinc.com wrote:
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks? It
seems
Also, IBM G8364 (uses Broadcom Trident merchant silicon).
I believe the Force10 S4810 (also Broadcom Trident) is only SFP+?
Intel will force 10GBASE-T on all of us since they can make it backwards
compatible with 1000BASE-T. I think this will make the technology take off
over the next year or
Sorry, that is IBM G8264T. G8316 is the 16x40G version.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Brian Loveland br...@aereo.com wrote:
Also, IBM G8364 (uses Broadcom Trident merchant silicon).
I believe the Force10 S4810 (also Broadcom Trident) is only SFP+?
Intel will force 10GBASE-T on all of us
We've been using IBM 10G switches (8124 and 8264) sfp varieties back when they
were Blade Networks. Very good performance, cost, and support. The use of
DACs/Twinax in our datacenters made our 10G overhaul budget work.
Hey guys,
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks? It
seems like the standard just died out. For us it would make a lot of sense
for our applications -- even if throughput and latency aren't as great. If
anyone out there knows of any *copper* 10 gig-t switches (48
Check out the Force 10 S4810 switch.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Andreas Echavez andr...@livejournalinc.com
wrote:
Hey guys,
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks? It
seems like the standard just died out. For us it would make a lot of sense
for our
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks? It
seems like the standard just died out. For us it would make a lot of sense
for our applications -- even if throughput and latency aren't as great. If
anyone out there knows of any *copper* 10 gig-t switches (48 port?), I'd
Mostly backwards compatibility; simplicity. We're planning for some
super-high-density virtualization/storage projects mixed in with lower
bandwidth gear, and sticking to one type of cable for everything would be
convenient. I thought DAC had some distance limitations as well.
This is all
Gotcha. With SFP+ I think the only nod to backward compatibility would
be 1gbit RJ-45 SFPs, which can get a little spendy in large numbers
(although so can DACs).
As for distance, I admit I haven't encountered any DACs longer than 15
meters (~49 feet) -- not that I'm positive they don't exist.
environments, DAC is a cheaper
and provides better latency for your storage traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Jima [mailto:na...@jima.tk]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 3:33 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T
Gotcha. With SFP+ I think the only nod
In article caj0nkqgy2x9pug26ccjchwdqsmy24f1u0rwmhf2poh2ehih...@mail.gmail.com,
Andreas Echavez andr...@livejournalinc.com wrote:
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks? It
seems like the standard just died out.
Well, our new supermicro servers come with 10Gbase-T
Andreas Echavez wrote:
Hey guys,
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks?
Yes.
It
seems like the standard just died out. For us it would make a lot of sense
for our applications -- even if throughput and latency aren't as great. If
anyone out there knows of any
13 matches
Mail list logo
