On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:37 AM, Michienne Dixon wrote:
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at
filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of the solutions offered cater
to the
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:44:57 EDT, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" said:
> I don't have any argument with making the end-user's experience simpler
> and easier. I do complain when that simplification is at the expense
> of others. It's the difference between software that does some of your
> work and software
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:37:51 -0500
"Michienne Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at filtering
> spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
> maillogs or mailhistory.
>
>
> Unfortunately, I feel the majority of
I too think C-R spam 'prevention' is the lazy-mans approach at filtering
spam. People can easily create their own whitelists based on their
maillogs or mailhistory.
Unfortunately, I feel the majority of the solutions offered cater to the
non-technical. The process of simplifying often results i
Quoting D'Arcy J.M. Cain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Personally I think that the answer to this problem is to simply reply
> automatically to these challenges positively no matter what. Puts the
> job of filtering spam back on the first person.
I tend to click on the 'authorize' links i see in any ti
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:21:22 -0400
Rich Kulawiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This doesn't look to me like phishing (although I can see the
> similarities); it looks like yet another severely clueless site engaged
> in challenge-response spamming. (C-R has long since been not only
> completely discr
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:16:22PM -0400, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> To prove that your message was sent by a human and not a computer, please
> visit the URL below and type in the alphanumeric text you will see in the
> image. You will be asked to do this only once for this recipient.
This does
: Howard C. Berkowitz
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Some odd harvesting going on?
I received the same message
Subject : Challenge Response
I received the same message
Subject : Challenge Response
Received: from mail.tcwireless.us ([67.108.86.20] verified)
Your message
...
has been just received by gmail.com mailserver.
I assumed that this is a phishing scam due to the from / mailserver
mismatch, which I think this confirms.
I just received the following:
Your message
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: RE: Fwd: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber
counterattacksystem(Einstein 3.0)
Date: 10/7/2008
has been just received by nanog.org mailserver.
To prove that your message
10 matches
Mail list logo
