Re: South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34

In article you write: >Let's call it for what it is. It's a new tax. No, it's just grandstanding. The proposed law egregiously violates the First Amendment and wouldn't last 5 minutes in a court challenge. R's, John

Re: South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34

On 12/19/2016 11:39 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote: > Break out the popcorn. > > http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html > "A bill pre-filed this month by state Rep. Bill Chumley would require sellers to install digital blocking capabilities on computers and other devices that

Re: South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34

Let's call it for what it is. It's a new tax. The manufactures/stores etc. wont want to he held liable and they will simply include the cost when selling a PC (does anyone other than us buy one of those these days?) On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tei wrote: > Users are crafty. > > One user on

Re: South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34

Users are crafty. One user on a network I had to admin use to mail porn has Microsoft Word documents to his Gmail account. So if you want to stop porn, you have to ban file attachments and monospace fonts. Good luck with that. On 20 December 2016 at 09:25, Jippen wrote: > So, $20 tax on all co

Re: South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34

So, $20 tax on all computers sold in SC in practice On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, 11:41 PM Jay Hennigan wrote: > Break out the popcorn. > > http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html > > -- > -- > Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net > Impulse Interne

South Carolina attempts to repeal Rule 34

Break out the popcorn. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article121673402.html -- -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV