Re: Spectrum prefix hijacks

2018-01-02 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:51 PM, James Milko wrote: > The output I dumped was from route-views.routeviews.org. On affected > prefes you get 7843->6453->nothing unaffected prefixes get > 7843->6453->15169. Unaffected prefixes don't have more specifics from > 10512. My sample size is only 8 thoug

Re: Spectrum prefix hijacks

2018-01-02 Thread James Milko
The output I dumped was from route-views.routeviews.org. On affected prefes you get 7843->6453->nothing unaffected prefixes get 7843->6453->15169. Unaffected prefixes don't have more specifics from 10512. My sample size is only 8 though with a mix of affected and unaffected users. JM On Tue, J

Re: Spectrum prefix hijacks

2018-01-02 Thread Christopher Morrow
it looks like 203040 is a pure transit as (no originated prefixes) and 1103 - surfnet could squish what is your view anyway. On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:50 PM, James Milko wrote: > >> Not sure if anyone from Spectrum is looking here a

Re: Spectrum prefix hijacks

2018-01-02 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:50 PM, James Milko wrote: > Not sure if anyone from Spectrum is looking here at this hour, but someone > is hijacking a few of your prefixes. It's causing problems in my area (NC) > with reaching Google services. I'm sure there are other impacts, but > that's what peopl

Spectrum prefix hijacks

2018-01-02 Thread James Milko
Not sure if anyone from Spectrum is looking here at this hour, but someone is hijacking a few of your prefixes. It's causing problems in my area (NC) with reaching Google services. I'm sure there are other impacts, but that's what people are noticing. Sorry if this hits the list twice, I sent it