Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

Some additional comments from Dave Taht, who does not subscribe to the nanog list. Also note the early WiFi results, which are spectacular. Your customers will have bufferbloat both due to the ISP, and due to the WiFi hop that is usually between them and their home router. Unfortunately, it's

Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

Just a quick clarifying reply, I have had DSL test give me an A for bufferbloat and a C for Speed on a 75 Meg line. On July 22, 2016 3:23:00 PM EDT, Jim Gettys wrote: >I don't read this list continually, but do archive it; your note was >flagged for me to comment on. > >On

Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > Den 22. jul. 2016 21.34 skrev "Jim Gettys" : > > > > > > So it is entirely appropriate in my view to give even "high speed" > > connections low grades; it's telling you that they suck under

Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

Den 22. jul. 2016 21.34 skrev "Jim Gettys" : > > > So it is entirely appropriate in my view to give even "high speed" > connections low grades; it's telling you that they suck under load > ​, like when your kid is downloading a video (or uploading one for their > friends);

RE: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

Jim, No problems, I just knew you were one of the project founders. I found it on the website shortly after posting. My google-fu wasn’t up to par. https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Tests_for_Bufferbloat/ I’m assuming I used the script last time for netperf, but have downloaded

Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

I don't read this list continually, but do archive it; your note was flagged for me to comment on. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Eric Tykwinski wrote: > This is probably for Jim Gettys directly, but I’m sure most others have > input. I could of sworn that that there

RE: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

Good point, we would need a piece of websocket code to run before or after NDT that figures out MAX speed so end users we can compare with other speed tests. NDT is about the quality of a connection, not absolute maximum quantity that can be jammed on a link irrespective of errors and all.

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

And work on accurate measurement of higher link speeds. ;-) On 7/20/16, 11:42 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Collin Anderson" wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote: >

Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

This is probably for Jim Gettys directly, but I’m sure most others have input. I could of sworn that that there was some test made to detect it directly on switches and routers? Sort of like iperf, but to test bufferbloat specifically given the OS stack which is going to have issues as well,

Re: I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

On 7/21/16, 2:19 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay R. Ashworth" wrote: >- Original Message - >> From: "Janusz Jezowicz" > >> Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome >> Reason: >>

I recommend dslreports.com/speedtest these days (was Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads)

- Original Message - > From: "Janusz Jezowicz" > Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome > Reason: > https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=c.speedtest.net > > For any ISPs/content providers linking to

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > Feedback: needs IPv6 connectivity and support. > Point well taken. The vast majority of M-Lab sites have IPv6 connectivity, and we have enabled it for NDT at times, but I believe there was a concern at one point

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Collin Anderson wrote: Thanks for the mention – for what it's worth, we are testing a more accessible interface for the web-based NDT test. Link: https://speed.measurementlab.net/#/ Definitely interested in feedback from the NANOG community. Feedback: needs IPv6

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

Thanks for the mention – for what it's worth, we are testing a more accessible interface for the web-based NDT test. Link: https://speed.measurementlab.net/#/ Definitely interested in feedback from the NANOG community. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Ishmael Rufus wrote:

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:56 PM, David wrote: > On 2016-07-20 12:52 PM, Jacques Latour wrote: > >> In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's >> MLAB-NDT based and checks IPv6 and DNSSEC :-) >> >> 100% ad free >> >> > And on the flip side, refuses to

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

Yup, websocket implementations across all browsers not equal On 2016-07-20, 2:56 PM, "NANOG on behalf of David" wrote: >On 2016-07-20 12:52 PM, Jacques Latour wrote: >> In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

On 2016-07-20 12:52 PM, Jacques Latour wrote: In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's MLAB-NDT based and checks IPv6 and DNSSEC :-) 100% ad free And on the flip side, refuses to work with Safari.

RE: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's MLAB-NDT based and checks IPv6 and DNSSEC :-) 100% ad free >-Original Message- >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ishmael Rufus >Sent: July-20-16 10:33 AM >To: Janusz Jezowicz >Cc: NANOG list

RE: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

It is back for us in Houston via NTT and Level 3 ... no warnings when you got to site... Robert Jacobs | Network Director/Architect Direct:  832-615-7742 Main:   832-615-8000 Fax:    713-510-1650 5959 Corporate Dr. Suite 3300; Houston, TX 77036 A Certified Woman-Owned Business 24x7x365

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

http://www.measurementlab.net/tools/ndt/ 100% ad free. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Janusz Jezowicz wrote: > It seems that some users reporting the site is back. I am counting 6+ hours > of outage. > > Alan - what you describe is something normal user will never

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

It seems that some users reporting the site is back. I am counting 6+ hours of outage. Alan - what you describe is something normal user will never do. When user sees red screen like that, he runs screaming. So in theory yes, it was accessible, but ... wasn't. Its hard to avoid Google nanny when

Re: Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

Hi, > Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome > Reason: > https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=c.speedtest.net someones complained about the URL based on them stupidly installing 'cleanmymac' or such? use the non flash junk HTML5 version

Speedtest.net not accessible in Chrome due to deceptive ads

Since this morning Speedtest.net is not accessible in Chrome Reason: https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagnostic/#url=c.speedtest.net For any ISPs/content providers linking to speedtest.net you may want to swap links to a different website or host your own speed test. e.g.