Re: Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-14 Thread Niels Bakker
* Shawn L [Mon 13 Nov 2023, 18:12 CET]: Is anyone else seeing a lot of 'strange' IPSEC traffic? This mail server running FreeBSD did: (timestamps in CET, UTC+1) Nov 10 00:58:55 mailserver kernel: ipsec_common_input: no key association found for SA 77.174.253.13/77b4/50 Nov 10 01:26:09

Re: Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-14 Thread Tom Beecher
023 at 12:42 PM Adrian Minta wrote: > On 11/13/23 19:10, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: > > Is anyone else seeing a lot of 'strange' IPSEC traffic? We started seeing > logs of IPSEC with invalid spi on Friday. We're seeing it on pretty much > all of our PE routers, none of which are setup

Re: Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-13 Thread Dobbins, Roland via NANOG
On Nov 14, 2023, at 00:12, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: The destination address is always one of our customer's ip addresses. Attackers will sometimes use synthetic ESP, AH, GRE, or other protocols in DDoS attacks, because organizations often only think about TCP/UDP/ICMP in terms of ACLs, DDoS

Re: Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-13 Thread Sabri Berisha
- On Nov 13, 2023, at 9:43 AM, Maurice Brown maur...@pwnship.com wrote: Hi, > A new attack was published against SSH and the paper authors are theorizing > that > the attack is possible against IPSEC due to flaws in the CPU that are > exploitable via brute force. For those interested, here

Re: Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-13 Thread Maurice Brown
Is anyone else seeing a lot of 'strange' IPSEC traffic? We started seeing > logs of IPSEC with invalid spi on Friday. We're seeing it on pretty much > all of our PE routers, none of which are setup to do anything VPN related. > Most are just routing local customer traffic. > > > &

RE: Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-13 Thread Mike Lewinski via NANOG
I can confirm we started seeing this on Nov 9th at 19:10 UTC across all markets from a variety of sources. If you want to filter it with ingress ACLs they need to include subnet base and broadcast addresses in addition to interface address, so a router at 192.168.1.1/30 with a customer

Re: Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-13 Thread Adrian Minta
On 11/13/23 19:10, Shawn L via NANOG wrote: Is anyone else seeing a lot of 'strange' IPSEC traffic?  We started seeing logs of IPSEC with invalid spi on Friday. We're seeing it on pretty much all of our PE routers, none of which are setup to do anything VPN related.  Most are just routing

Strange IPSEC traffic

2023-11-13 Thread Shawn L via NANOG
Is anyone else seeing a lot of 'strange' IPSEC traffic? We started seeing logs of IPSEC with invalid spi on Friday. We're seeing it on pretty much all of our PE routers, none of which are setup to do anything VPN related. Most are just routing local customer traffic. decaps: rec'd IPSEC