I think the T-Mobile site is https://howmobileworks.com/indoor-coverage/
Keep scrolling and you'll see the Wifi and Passpoint information.
I'm not affiliated but got lost in a google rabbit hole learning about this
tech.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:53 PM Faisal Imtiaz
wrote:
> He
Hello,
Is there any one here on Nanog list that has experience or information on how
to setup T-Mobile Wifi Carrier Off-load ? (Passpoint), for enterprise use ?
(I am familiar with and working with Google Orion, I am needing to do the same
for T-Mobile)
Will greatly appreciate any or all info
I posted this on the outages mailing-list too, and I am hoping to get more
eyeballs on this while also checking in to see if this is isolated to just
us. On T-Mobile, we do not seem to be able to get to ipv4 sites.
ipv4.google.com does not load, ipv6.google.com does. Even www.t-mobile.com
does
T-Mobile data services in general seem to have recently gone downhill in
the northwest.
Here in Portland, OR, I'm seeing it all backhauled to California randomly,
usually with high latency and high packet loss. Something tells me their
Tmobile/Sprint merger is not going well at all.
On Fri
Your data roaming in the Pacific Northwest with the Bell/Telus network is
95% broken at present.
UDP works. QUIC works (such as to use Chrome on a mobile device to do
something with Google). Ordinary port 53 DNS resolution works.
TCP is entirely broken.
After a considerable amount of time, I hav
, 2021 1:42 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: T-Mobile RF contact
I realize this isn’t an RF list but was hoping someone on here could point me
in the right direction.
Does anyone know how to get in touch with a T-Mobile RF engineer?
Our CBRS network has been receiving heavy interference from
ut was hoping someone on here could point
> me in the right direction.
>
> Does anyone know how to get in touch with a T-Mobile RF engineer?
>
> Our CBRS network has been receiving heavy interference from what we
> believe is a new T-Mobile site at an American tower facility.
>
>
RF list but was hoping someone on here could point
> me in the right direction.
>
> Does anyone know how to get in touch with a T-Mobile RF engineer?
>
> Our CBRS network has been receiving heavy interference from what we
> believe is a new T-Mobile site at an American tower facili
right direction.
>
> Does anyone know how to get in touch with a T-Mobile RF engineer?
>
> Our CBRS network has been receiving heavy interference from what we believe
> is a new T-Mobile site at an American tower facility.
>
> The equipment isn’t registered with the SAS and ap
I realize this isn’t an RF list but was hoping someone on here could point
me in the right direction.
Does anyone know how to get in touch with a T-Mobile RF engineer?
Our CBRS network has been receiving heavy interference from what we believe
is a new T-Mobile site at an American tower facility
Hello,
Could someone in the T-Mobile RF Engineering Department with information
on the Williamsport, PA MSA contact me offlist?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:53 AM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > The larger story here is...
> >
> > "7. Routing. Routers connect T-Mobile’s LTE towers to T-Mobile’s LTE
> > network. These routers utilize a routing protocol called Open
> > Shortest Path First."
>
> you can blow it with is-is, just as yo
> The larger story here is...
>
> "7. Routing. Routers connect T-Mobile’s LTE towers to T-Mobile’s LTE
> network. These routers utilize a routing protocol called Open
> Shortest Path First."
you can blow it with is-is, just as you can with ospf, just as you can
with pretty much any dynamic [rou
gt; - On Nov 12, 2020, at 9:35 AM, Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > FCC Issues Staff Report On T-Mobile Outage
> >
> > https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-issues-staff-report-t-mobile-outage-0
>
> This part, I find most interesting as well:
>
&
- On Nov 12, 2020, at 9:35 AM, Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote:
Hi,
> FCC Issues Staff Report On T-Mobile Outage
>
> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-issues-staff-report-t-mobile-outage-0
This part, I find most interesting as well:
> However, they were unable to resolve
FCC Issues Staff Report On T-Mobile Outage
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-issues-staff-report-t-mobile-outage-0
The outage was initially caused by an equipment failure and then
exacerbated by a network routing misconfiguration that occurred when
T-Mobile introduced a new router into its
FCC Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Seeks Comment on Effects of
June 15, 2020 T-Mobile Outage on Public Safety Entities, Government
Entities, and Consumers
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-seeks-comment-effects-june-15-t-mobile-outage
From T-Mobile's statement:
https://
4 AM Ca By wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:05 AM David Funderburk
> wrote:
>
>> One of our customers office number is coming across as 'Survey Call' on
>> T-Mobile cell phones. I know with certainty it's with 'T-Mobile' phones.
>>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 6:05 AM David Funderburk
wrote:
> One of our customers office number is coming across as 'Survey Call' on
> T-Mobile cell phones. I know with certainty it's with 'T-Mobile' phones.
> I don't have another contact on another network
You may want to try VoiceOps:
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:05 AM David Funderburk
wrote:
> One of our customers office number is coming across as 'Survey Call' on
> T-Mobile cell phones. I know with certainty it's with &
One of our customers office number is coming across as 'Survey Call' on
T-Mobile cell phones. I know with certainty it's with 'T-Mobile'
phones. I don't have another contact on another network that I know I
can try. How do we get that fixed?
Thanks for any sug
>> Does anyone have a contact and TMobiles Telco fraud department?
> ab...@t-mobile.com
rofl!
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:26 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
> Does anyone have a contact and TMobiles Telco fraud department?
>
ab...@t-mobile.com
Does anyone have a contact and TMobiles Telco fraud department?
ools.ietf.org/html/draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01
>
>
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT&T
> > > mobile devices this weekend. The
r
“trusted proxy”
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT&T
> > mobile devices this weekend. The website worked fo
21, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT&T
> mobile devices this weekend. The website worked for everybody not on
> AT&T mobile, and AT&T mobile users could access other sites; the problem
> was just this
VPNs that aren't standard
SSL VPNs. They appear to MITM all web traffic they can. Using third party DNS
servers has questionable results.
On Mon, May 21, 2018, at 12:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT&T
> mobile device
> On May 21, 2018, at 3:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT&T
> mobile devices this weekend. The website worked for everybody not on
> AT&T mobile, and AT&T mobile users could access other sites;
I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT&T
mobile devices this weekend. The website worked for everybody not on
AT&T mobile, and AT&T mobile users could access other sites; the problem
was just this combination.
Android and iOS phones, as well as a Linux sys
>
> Sorry for using the white paging phone, but I have an IPv4 reachability
> ticket that I opened back in January that’s stuck in limbo.
>
> Ticket number is either 26088938 or 18444951. Users on T-Mobile data can’t
> reach services in 208.89.64.0/21, specifically 208.8
Sorry for using the white paging phone, but I have an IPv4 reachability ticket
that I opened back in January that’s stuck in limbo.
Ticket number is either 26088938 or 18444951. Users on T-Mobile data can’t
reach services in 208.89.64.0/21, specifically 208.89.64.154.
—Chris
Hey all, just wondering if AS21928 has a looking glass.
- Tyler
Replying to
the new peer on the T-mobile-internal IPv6 address should still work as long
as you stay on T-mobile's network but are of limited use otherwise.
-- Aaron
te:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> > >
> > > >While doing statistics on the participants of a public DHT, I was
> > > >surprised to see some IP addresses that are not present in the DFZ:
> > >
> > > I believe those
e are used by T-mobile's 464XLAT (RFC 6877) implementation.
>
> Recent Android on T-mobile is IPv6-only and has no ability to connect to
> raw IPv4 addresses. T-mobile's DNS servers are only asked by these devices
> to translate hostnames to IPv6 addresses. If they can't
used by T-mobile's 464XLAT (RFC 6877) implementation.
>
> Recent Android on T-mobile is IPv6-only and has no ability to connect to
> raw IPv4 addresses. T-mobile's DNS servers are only asked by these devices
> to translate hostnames to IPv6 addresses. If they can't find an
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
While doing statistics on the participants of a public DHT, I was
surprised to see some IP addresses that are not present in the DFZ:
I believe those are used by T-mobile's 464XLAT (RFC 6877) implementation.
Recent Android on T-mobile is IPv6
0:0:25::c808:db2c
> 2607:7700:0:4::3294:6683
> 2607:7700:0:4::4c09:4d39
> 2607:7700:0:4::5985:87d1
> 2607:7700:0:4::5d7d:3df8
>
> All those IP are in 2607:7700::/32, allocated to T-Mobile USA but never
> announced:
>
> https://stat.ripe.net/2607%3A7700%3A%3A%2F32#tabId=a
:7700:0:4::5d7d:3df8
All those IP are in 2607:7700::/32, allocated to T-Mobile USA but never
announced:
https://stat.ripe.net/2607%3A7700%3A%3A%2F32#tabId=at-a-glance
What could explain their usage in an application? Some form of address
translation? Maybe these addresses have been used as
Is there anyone from T-mobile here, or does anybody have a T-mobile contact
with whom they can put me in touch?
Anne
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
CEO/President
ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification
http://www.SuretyMail.com/
http://www.SuretyMail.eu/
Author: Section
Would someone from T-Mobile be willing to contact me offline about
some abuse issues we are having?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeremy
Check this out.
Cheers,
-- jra
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11956
This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought
you might be interested in the page linked above.
- Original Message -
> From: "JP Viljoen"
[ Rich K wrote: ]
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:59:53AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> >> If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which
> >> addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of [snip]
> >
> > SPF is s
On 20 Feb 2013, at 5:22 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:59:53AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>> If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which
>> addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of [snip]
>
> SPF is snake-oil. Here's something
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:59:53AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which
> addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of [snip]
SPF is snake-oil. Here's something that works (salt to taste for
the MTA of your choice):
Con
If only there were some kind of method for Jay to publish which
addresses are actually authorized to send mail on behalf of
baylink.com (which could then be leveraged by sc1.nanog.org to turn
the recommended soft fail into a hard fail and stop this kind of
silliness cold)...
Billet:~ rs$ dig +sho
All in favor of phonescoop being blacklisted from nanog? Anyone?
Anyone? Buehler?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> haha i love the header:
>
> Received: (from nobody@localhost)
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
>> Check this out:
>>
>> http://ww
Merlin is back; especially for Jay...:-)
./Randy
--- On Tue, 2/19/13, Jonathan Rogers wrote:
> From: Jonathan Rogers
> Subject: Re: Check this out T-Mobile Launches GoSmart Prepaid Service
> Nationally on Phone Scoop
> To: "Grant Ridder"
> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org&
An email from nobody? WHAT IS THIS SORCERY?!?
--JR
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> haha i love the header:
>
> Received: (from nobody@localhost)
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> > Check this out:
> >
> > http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/arti
haha i love the header:
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Check this out:
>
> http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946
>
> This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender
> thought you might be interested
Check this out:
http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=11946
This email was sent via Phone Scoop (www.phonescoop.com). The sender thought
you might be interested in the page linked above.
Hi Folks,
I'm seeing TXT messages leaving our network to @txt.att.net and
@tmomail.netusers. The messages look very spammy. I'm wondering if
there have been any
complaints of TXT spam from the IP address 66.36.240.39 (messages are From:
davidba...@tmsg4.com).
I have examples if you are interest
I wanted to thank everyone for their helpful on-list and off-list reply's.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:44 AM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: T-Mobile USA - Peering Polic
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Ryan Finnesey
wrote:
> Can someone on the list from T-Mobile USA please contact me. I have
> tried sending a message to ad...@tmodns.net but the message bounces back
> and the mailbox for arintechcont...@t-mobile.com is full. I am trying
>
Hi George
It is late on the east coast and maybe I am missing something but I do
not see T-Systems connected to the T-Mobile USA network. I do see it
connected to most of the T-Mobile networks across Europe but I will ping
the contacts listed in peerdb for AS3320.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original
/Apricot2004
%20T-Systems%20Peering.PDF
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:42 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: T-Mobile USA - Peering Policy
>
> I looked into Deutsche Tel
I looked into Deutsche Telekom and T-System but the AS I have for
T-Mobile USA does not seem to be connected to either network which is
odd because Deutsche Telekom owns T-Mobile USA but thank you for the
recommendation.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: kris foster [mailto:kris.fos
Can someone on the list from T-Mobile USA please contact me. I have
tried sending a message to ad...@tmodns.net but the message bounces back
and the mailbox for arintechcont...@t-mobile.com is full. I am trying
to find out information regarding there peering policy.
Cheers
Ryan
iOS bring IPv6 to WiFi as a first step,
but they need to keep going.
Here is a short thread on the Android IPv6 issue, it is really
Qualcomm's issue at this point http://tinyurl.com/28nttno
Cameron
>
> On 1/08/2010 9:46 a.m., Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> T
lks,
>
> T-Mobile USA has launched an IPv6 beta service and we are interested
> in recruiting some friendly users as part of this trial service.
> Right now, the service is only for T-Mobile USA subscribers in
> T-Mobile USA coverage (no roaming) and only Nokia phones are
> supporte
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Joshua William Klubi wrote:
Have you considered updating the Nokia n900 to the latest version of OS ie
PR2 they fixed ipv6 stack
I updated to PR1.2 when it was released (if this is what you mean) and all
the tests were done with that. The stock kernel doesn't even have IPv
Have you considered updating the Nokia n900 to the latest version of OS ie
PR2 they fixed ipv6 stack
Sent from My Google Nexus 1
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Stefan wrote:
>
>> Nokia N900: http://n900-ipv6.garage.maemo.org/ - worth giving it a shot
...
>
> Just as an FYI, the N900 Connection Manager (ju
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Stefan wrote:
Nokia N900: http://n900-ipv6.garage.maemo.org/ - worth giving it a shot ...
Just as an FYI, the N900 Connection Manager (just like the Ubuntu Linux
equivalent) doesn't consider getting an IPv6 address+DNS only (no IPv4) as
being "connected", and considers t
Nokia N900: http://n900-ipv6.garage.maemo.org/ - worth giving it a shot ...
***Stefan Mititelu
http://twitter.com/netfortius
http://www.linkedin.com/in/netfortius
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> T-Mobile USA has launched an IPv6 beta service a
Folks,
T-Mobile USA has launched an IPv6 beta service and we are interested
in recruiting some friendly users as part of this trial service.
Right now, the service is only for T-Mobile USA subscribers in
T-Mobile USA coverage (no roaming) and only Nokia phones are
supported.
For more info and
Great question Jared! But I think for WPS to work you have to dial FROM a
T-Mobile device rather than TO the device. But of course if the system is
kaput WPS will be too.
Based on what's happening at Twitter will we need TPS (Twitter Priority
Service) some day in the near future?
According to what I got from t-mobile
It out and in but only between t-mobile devices, phone, sms, and data.
Data to the rest, as well as cell and sms to the rest still work
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
Global outage
--Original Message--
From: charles.jougl...@cox.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: T-Mobile ?
Sent: Nov 3, 2009 17:18
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot reach
anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works sporadically, but
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot reach
anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works sporadically, but calls
drop frequently.
Thanks,
Charles
We're using T-Mobile here, no issues reported. I have staff at sites
in Virginia, California, and Arizona.
Jeff
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:18 PM, wrote:
> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot
> reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialin
BBM still work. Web browsing
still works.
Seems their UMA (GSM over TCP/IP) servers are down too. Pretty bad.
- Cary
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> We're using T-Mobile here, no issues reported. I have staff at sites
> in Virginia, California, and Arizona.
>
This was brought up on the outages list. T-Mobile is currently experiencing
large scale outbound voice and data outages across the nation right now. No
current ETA, estimates are several hours.
Paul B.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:18 PM, wrote:
> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile netw
U.S.
>
> --
> Is ait an mac an sol.
> Life is strange (such is life).
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 7:19 PM, Ben Carleton wrote:
>
> We are also seeing this in the Metro NY market.
>>
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
>>
>
d a 'feature' when you go to
> pay your bill:
>
>
> <http://consumerist.com/5395978/reader-paid-my-t+mobile-bill-saw-some-boobs>
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
>
>
--
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.ne
:
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we
cannot reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works
sporadically, but calls drop frequently.
Thanks,
Charles
--
Jonathan Bishop -- moonw...@lasthome.net
http://lasthome.net/~moonwick/
"Embrace the co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009.11.03 17:18:06, charles.jougl...@cox.com wrote:
> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we cannot
> reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works sporadically, but
> calls drop frequently.
&g
Cc: charles.jougl...@cox.com
Sent: Nov 3, 2009 20:41
Subject: Re: T-Mobile ?
This problem also seems to be affecting tmo users in NYC. I'm unable
to reach any tmo user from Att network
Sent from my iPhone 3GS.
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Michael Schuler wrote:
> Illinois is experien
We are also seeing this in the Metro NY market.
Ben
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we
cannot reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works
sporadically, but calls drop frequently.
Thanks,
Charles
Has anyone here with WPS/GETS tested calling T-Mobile users?
I'm curious to know results.
- Jared
Life is strange (such is life).
On Nov 3, 2009, at 7:19 PM, Ben Carleton wrote:
We are also seeing this in the Metro NY market.
Ben
On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we
cannot reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialin
Thanks. Experiencing the inability to reach several personnel.
Thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bosworth [mailto:pboswo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 7:22 PM
To: Jouglard, Charles (CCI-Louisiana)
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: T-Mobile ?
This was
issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we
cannot reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works
sporadically, but calls drop frequently.
Thanks,
Charles
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 8:18 PM, wrote:
>
>> Anyone hear of any issues on the T-Mobile network? Seems as if we
>> cannot reach anyone with a T-Mobile cell phone. Dialing out works
>> sporadically, but calls drop frequently.
>
> T-
You may have more luck posting on one of these listservs:
http://listserv.neustar.biz/mailman/listinfo
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Aaron D. Osgood [mailto:aosg...@streamline-solutions.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 8:11 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Clueful T-Mobile contact on
Do telco admins usally hang out on here? I know the telco side is an
animal in it's self.
-carlos
-Original Message-
From: Aaron D. Osgood [mailto:aosg...@streamline-solutions.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 6:11 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Clueful T-Mobile contact o
Please accept my apologies for the waste of space - Will someone from
T-Mobile please contact me off list? It seems there is a 10k block of
NPA-NXX #'s not in your table.
All other rectification contact attempts have failed
Thanks!
Aaron D. Osgood
Streamline Solutions L.L.C
87 matches
Mail list logo
