On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 20:58:17 -0700, Matt Corallo said:
> If your goal is to force companies the world over to host domestically, where
> they follow local licensing regimes (yes, including censorship, as well as
> data
> access), itâs highly effective.
You missed the point.
There's a
If your goal is to force companies the world over to host domestically, where
they follow local licensing regimes (yes, including censorship, as well as data
access), it’s highly effective. Even better, it makes users fail to identify
the difference between “google is down because it is
On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:47:22 -0700, Matt Corallo said:
> No one suggested it isnât censorship, youâre bating here. Not deploying
> enough international capacity is absolutely a form or censorship deployed to
> great avail - if international sites load too slow, you can skimp on GF
>
On 4/1/20 12:47, Matt Corallo wrote:
No one suggested it isn’t censorship, you’re bating here.
I think you mean baiting, but perhaps not. ;-)
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
Thank you for your understanding and your patience and kindness to explain
it to us. We really appreciate it.
We will keep that in mind and won’t ask this kind of questions again.
Thanks again.
Pengxiong
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:59 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
> I do understand that you mean well,
I do understand that you mean well, but do realize that interconnection
between the rest of the world and the networks controlled by the Chinese
government is a very, very sensitive and often touchy subject. It's also
generally true that networks aren't going to disclose terms of commercial
>
> No one suggested it isn’t censorship,
>
In fact, some replies suggested it’s more commercial actions. We said it's
"likely influenced by commercial decisions", we didn't say censorship is
out of the question. We still think censorship is the possible cause, but
we run out of methods to verify
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:54 PM Pengxiong Zhu wrote:
> Sorry we didn’t know this is out of scope. What do you mean by baiting
> questions?
>
This is an operator list. Not an opened research discussion. Take it off
the list.
We are not very familiar with the peer protocol,
>
Then pay an expert
Sorry we didn’t know this is out of scope. What do you mean by baiting
questions? We are not very familiar with the peer protocol, so we don’t
know what questions can be discussed here or not. We are researches, we
just want to dig more to the cause of the slowdown that we observed. And we
thought
No one suggested it isn’t censorship, you’re bating here. Not deploying enough
international capacity is absolutely a form or censorship deployed to great
avail - if international sites load too slow, you can skimp on GF appliances!
Matt
> On Apr 1, 2020, at 12:26, Pengxiong Zhu wrote:
> Many
This topic is out of scope for the list. Please stop emailing these baiting
questions.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:27 PM Pengxiong Zhu wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We got plenty of positive responses in our last email regarding China's
> slow transnational network. Many are suggesting it is likely
Hi folks,
We got plenty of positive responses in our last email regarding China's
slow transnational network. Many are suggesting it is likely influenced by
commercial decisions instead of censorship. It seems like the three Chinese
ISPs don't really have enough peering internationally in Asia,
12 matches
Mail list logo
