On 7/22/14 1:55 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
You're over-thinking it. Use the power company as a model and you'll
close to the right path.
Well, no, but thanks for your thoughts.
Portland vs. Cumberland County as respective hypothetical bonding and
regulating authorities, not {Bangor Hydro|Florida P
You're over-thinking it. Use the power company as a model and you'll
close to the right path.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
wrote:
> On 7/22/14 11:13 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>>
>> Municipal FTTH needs to be a regulated public utility (ideally at a
>> state or regional level
On 7/22/14 11:13 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
Municipal FTTH needs to be a regulated public utility (ideally at a
state or regional level). It should have an open access policy at
published rates and be forbidden from offering lit service on the
fiber (conflict of interest).
Ray,
Could you offer a ca
3 matches
Mail list logo