Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-04 Thread Brandon Martin
On 8/4/19 3:27 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: For shorter runs, I think it's cheaper to find dark fibre and do something yourself. This was a bit of an unusual situation. One end it rather rural. The only fiber within miles was one semi-independent operator, the area RBOC, and Comcast. The

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-04 Thread Etienne-Victor Depasquale
A friend of mine whom I rely upon took it upon himself to put my question to a reliable contact of his. In the hope of adding some value to this thread, I'm reproducing this exchange with their names removed, in descending chronological order (latest first, earliest last). Academic in the US:It’s

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On 4/Aug/19 02:16, Brandon Martin wrote: >   > > Those are definitely longer distances than I was inquiring about.  I > was asking for distances in the range of more like 100km. For shorter runs, I think it's cheaper to find dark fibre and do something yourself. Mark.

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-03 Thread Brandon Martin
On 8/3/19 6:58 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: We are seeing requests from as low as 600km, up to 1,600km, all the way to 7,000km. Those are definitely longer distances than I was inquiring about. I was asking for distances in the range of more like 100km. Those distances are firmly into the

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-03 Thread Mark Tinka
On 3/Aug/19 17:04, Valdis Kl ē tnieks wrote: > I'm having a hard time seeing any of those distances as being "metro" as > opposed to long-haul.. or did they change the definitions again while I wasn't > paying attention? I was answering Brandon's query re: spectrum over distance. The OP's

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-03 Thread Valdis Klētnieks
On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:58:01 +0200, Mark Tinka said: > On 3/Aug/19 03:14, Brandon Martin wrote: > > � I've inquired with a few metro operators in my area about something > > like this, albeit a few years ago, and I got a pretty hard "no way > > we'd ever do that" out of them presumably for the

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-03 Thread Mark Tinka
On 3/Aug/19 03:14, Brandon Martin wrote: >   > > How are they handling optical power balancing across amplifiers and > such?  Do they just trust the customer to provide light at the power > levels agreed upon?  Bulk attenuate the entire "spectrum" > automatically?  Monitor and drop the whole

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-02 Thread Brandon Martin
On 8/2/19 4:10 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: Now, the next step in all this that is starting to gain a bit of traction is "spectrum", i.e., rather than take a normal grey service from a Transport operator, have them deliver you a portion of the DWDM spectrum so that you can run as much bandwidth as you

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-02 Thread Mark Tinka
On 2/Aug/19 20:06, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: > Bear with me one more time as I drill down a little and spell things > out. I've realized that there may be more than one interpretation of > "EoDWDM". Are you referring to: > > (a) Ethernet packets in OTU frames - thereby implying an

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-02 Thread Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Bear with me one more time as I drill down a little and spell things out. I've realized that there may be more than one interpretation of "EoDWDM". Are you referring to: (a) Ethernet packets in OTU frames - thereby implying an underlying OTN? (b) Ethernet optical SFP+ transceivers with a cable

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-02 Thread Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Mark, when you write "There is a healthy sharing of the pie between DWDM and packet to drive these Ethernet Metro's ", can you elaborate a little? Are you referring specifically to EoDWDM, or do you have something else in mind? Etienne On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:10 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > And

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-02 Thread Mark Tinka
On 2/Aug/19 10:17, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: > Mark, when you write "There is a healthy sharing of the pie between > DWDM and packet to drive these Ethernet Metro's ", can you elaborate a > little? Are you referring specifically to EoDWDM, or do you have > something else in mind?

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-02 Thread Mark Tinka
And just to add that I think that as part of the future, 5G is likely to play a big part as well, somewhere between the Metro and the Access. Mark.

Re: The future of transport in the metro area

2019-08-02 Thread Mark Tinka
On 31/Jul/19 16:48, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote: > > "I'm trying to identify trends in adoption of transport technology in > the metro-area. If legacy is SDH/SONET and its successor in circuit > transport is OTN, what are network providers implementing and planning > to implement as

The future of transport in the metro area

2019-07-31 Thread Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Hello, I'm new to this mailing list. I hope I've understood the scope correctly! I've posted this question to ResearchGate but I haven't had any response. I'm hoping for some guidance from here. The question is: "I'm trying to identify trends in adoption of transport technology in the