Re: Traffic billing - L2 encap to include or not?

2009-06-13 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:32:42PM +0200, Weber, Markus wrote: > > So, is L2 encapsulation (e.g. Ethernet) considered as framing characters > or not? > > Cisco does count them (looks like they also count the FCS), while > Juniper does not (at least not on their routers) with above MIBs. > So who

Re: Traffic billing - L2 encap to include or not?

2009-06-12 Thread Renaud RAKOTOMALALA
Weber, Markus a écrit : We all have our billing systems for traffic (bought, downloaded or home made, volume based or usage). We all got hit by fancy SNMP bugs of various vendors and we all suffer from the fact, that SNMP counters do not carry a time stamp, when they had been taken from the ASI

Traffic billing - L2 encap to include or not?

2009-06-12 Thread Weber, Markus
We all have our billing systems for traffic (bought, downloaded or home made, volume based or usage). We all got hit by fancy SNMP bugs of various vendors and we all suffer from the fact, that SNMP counters do not carry a time stamp, when they had been taken from the ASICs, causing a slight deri