On 4/Jan/16 21:03, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> there are complications with an L3 vpn solution that L2/vpls doesn't
> bring along... and sometimes VPLS is cheaper than a wave/ptp-link ...
> and all I want is a ptp
You would fall under "other customers".
Mark.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Almost every time a customer has asked me for VPLS (or EVPN), they've
> been just fine with l3vpn as a suggested alternative.
>
> Other customers are all about doing their own routing...
there are complications with an L3 vpn solution that L2/vp
On 1/Jan/16 17:19, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> If you're talking a requirement for connecting geographically separated
> locations, there are sound technical reasons for avoiding vpls like the
> plague. Unless there are overriding technical reasons why it wouldn't
> work, l3vpn will almost always
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:55:24 -0500, Chris Burwell said:
> Hi NANOG,
>
> I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for
> connectivity among about ten sites in North America,
Going to depend a lot on what the 10 sites are. You're in Fairfax, Virg
In 2016 we will start seeing first massive EVPN deployments.
If you really need L2 with multihoming and BGP FRR speeds in service recovery -
look for EVPN, otherwise, as mentioned below - L3 is your friend.
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Chris Burwell wrot
Chris Burwell wrote:
> I've had enough trouble with broadcast storms and other issues in N.A.
And you still want vpls? Wow.
If you're talking a requirement for connecting geographically separated
locations, there are sound technical reasons for avoiding vpls like the
plague. Unless there are ov
December 31, 2015 2:55:24 PM
Subject: VPLS Providers
Hi NANOG,
I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for
connectivity among about ten sites in North America, however feedback for
providers that also extend service to EMEA and APAC would also be welcom
ing those issues on a global
scale!
- Chris
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Ca By wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, December 31, 2015, Chris Burwell wrote:
>
>> Hi NANOG,
>>
>> I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for
>>
On Thursday, December 31, 2015, Chris Burwell wrote:
> Hi NANOG,
>
> I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for
> connectivity among about ten sites in North America, however feedback for
> providers that also extend service to EMEA and APAC w
Hi NANOG,
I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for
connectivity among about ten sites in North America, however feedback for
providers that also extend service to EMEA and APAC would also be welcome.
All types of feedback are appreciated (good, bad, and any
10 matches
Mail list logo
