On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 19:16 +, Andy Davidson wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2010, at 05:30, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
>
> > Mark Schouten wrote:
> >> http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6
> >> Comments on the listing method are appreciated.
> > wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope y
On 16 Jan 2010, at 05:30, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote:
> Mark Schouten wrote:
>> http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6
>> Comments on the listing method are appreciated.
> wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope you have a
> TON of ram for that box. for example
> if we loaded th
- "Mark Schouten" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI:
>
> http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6
>
> Comments on the listing method are appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope you have a TON
of ram for that box. for example
if we loaded the current
The listing method is if you actually receive virus traffic over v6.
Which someone will, sooner or later ..
Yes, I agree with listing a slightly larger range - given that /64
seems to be what most anyone gets these days with a free tunnel.
I wish you all the very best of fun trying to run dnsbl z
Hi,
FYI:
http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6
Comments on the listing method are appreciated.
Regards,
--
Mark Schouten, Unix/NOC-engineer
BIT BV | i...@bit.nl | +31 318 648688 | KvK: 09090351
MS8714-RIPE | B1FD 8E60 A184 F89A 450D A128 049B 1B19 9AD6 17FF
5 matches
Mail list logo