Re: Virbl: The First IPv6 enabled dnsbl?

2010-06-28 Thread William Pitcock
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 19:16 +, Andy Davidson wrote: > On 16 Jan 2010, at 05:30, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote: > > > Mark Schouten wrote: > >> http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6 > >> Comments on the listing method are appreciated. > > wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope y

Re: Virbl: The First IPv6 enabled dnsbl?

2010-01-17 Thread Andy Davidson
On 16 Jan 2010, at 05:30, Tammy A. Wisdom wrote: > Mark Schouten wrote: >> http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6 >> Comments on the listing method are appreciated. > wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope you have a > TON of ram for that box. for example > if we loaded th

Re: [mailop] Virbl: The First IPv6 enabled dnsbl?

2010-01-15 Thread Tammy A. Wisdom
- "Mark Schouten" wrote: > Hi, > > FYI: > > http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6 > > Comments on the listing method are appreciated. > > Regards, > wow bind? thats gonna get slower and slower and slower. I hope you have a TON of ram for that box. for example if we loaded the current

Re: Virbl: The First IPv6 enabled dnsbl?

2010-01-15 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
The listing method is if you actually receive virus traffic over v6. Which someone will, sooner or later .. Yes, I agree with listing a slightly larger range - given that /64 seems to be what most anyone gets these days with a free tunnel. I wish you all the very best of fun trying to run dnsbl z

Virbl: The First IPv6 enabled dnsbl?

2010-01-15 Thread Mark Schouten
Hi, FYI: http://virbl.bit.nl/index.php#ipv6 Comments on the listing method are appreciated. Regards, -- Mark Schouten, Unix/NOC-engineer BIT BV | i...@bit.nl | +31 318 648688 | KvK: 09090351 MS8714-RIPE | B1FD 8E60 A184 F89A 450D A128 049B 1B19 9AD6 17FF