If you intend to fully self host something, the full mediawiki software
that runs the back end of wikipedia is suitable. It's entirely composed of
BSD/GPL/Apache licensed software. If you have any persons who are competent
at administering and customizing stuff on normal LAMP stack servers it
shoul
On 3/17/20 8:25 PM, Craig wrote:
Then comes the task of getting the legacy wiki pages off the Mac wiki
server over to the new wiki
Oh, man. If you figure that one out, let me know. I'm in the same boat
there.
Steve
--
-
Greatly appreciate all these suggestions, we are going to test several of
these packages out and determine which will be best for us.
Thanks!
Then comes the task of getting the legacy wiki pages off the Mac wiki
server over to the new wiki
Argg
More figuring out to do.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at
We're a new group and at recommendation of this thread, I set up
dokuwiki for us and I like it already!
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:54 PM Jens Link wrote:
>
> Craig writes:
>
> > Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to /
> > how to's for staff, etc.
>
> On the wi
Craig writes:
> Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to /
> how to's for staff, etc.
On the wiki side: +1 for dokuwiki
Given that more and more people are automating stuff and this way ending
up git anyway:
Write your doku as markdown, put it into git, gener
g T. Grimes
> Senior Network Analyst
> Information Technology Services
> Mississippi State University
> greg.gri...@msstate.edu
> 662-325-9311
>
>
> From: NANOG on behalf of Yang Yu <
yang.yu.l...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, Ma
ppi State University
greg.gri...@msstate.edu
662-325-9311
From: NANOG on behalf of Yang Yu
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2020 06:59
To: Brielle
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: WIKI documentation Software?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 7:07 AM Brielle wrote:
>
> I pers
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 7:07 AM Brielle wrote:
>
> I personally like Dokuwiki a lot.
>
> From a usability standpoint, once you spend a few learning the interface,
> it’s very simplistic and not overwhelming in features. You can always add
> extensions for stuff you need that isn’t there out of
We've been using BookStack. It's easy for staff to use and understand. We
gave each department their own "shelf" in there and can assign rights to
shelves so managers of the departments can add their own
books/chapters/pages. Once you dive in you'll see how it's organized but
it's a really solid pl
I've been using MoinMoin wiki for years. It hasn't been updated for
quite a while, but it has worked really well for me, is trivial to
install, uses text file backend so no need for a database, allows for
hierarchical structure, is pretty fast, is very very light weight and
extensible, built o
I think DokuWiki does this and as an added bonus saves all as text files.
: WIKI documentation Software?
Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to / how
to's for staff, etc.
pro's
con's
We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced
before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones.
thanks;
CPV
B, R3T 6A8
(204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
athomp...@merlin.mb.ca<mailto:athomp...@merlin.mb.ca>
www.merlin.mb.ca<http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Craig
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 7:08 AM
To: nanog group
Subject: WIKI documentation Software?
Wante
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://go.oit.co/linkedin>
>
> [image: Twitter] <https://go.oit.co/twitter>
>
> [image: YouTube] <https://go.oit.co/youtube>
>
> *How are we doing? We'd love to hear your feedback. https://go.oit.co/review
> <https://go.oit.co/r
f Of Craig
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:34 AM
To: Nicholas Oas ; nanog group
Subject: Re: WIKI documentation Software?
Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen ,
We’ve managed to avoid using that.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas
mailto:nicholas@gmail.com>>
Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen ,
We’ve managed to avoid using that.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas
wrote:
> Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint.
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig wrote:
>
>> Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are us
> On Mar 14, 2020, at 7:05 AM, Brielle wrote:
> I personally like Dokuwiki a lot.
Dokuwiki is definitely my favorite as well. The UI is appropriate to the task,
so you get work done quickly and without a lot of fuss.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message
I personally like Dokuwiki a lot.
From a usability standpoint, once you spend a few learning the interface, it’s
very simplistic and not overwhelming in features. You can always add
extensions for stuff you need that isn’t there out of box.
From a technical standpoint, it doesn’t need a databa
On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 08:07 -0400, Craig wrote:
> Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save
> documentation to /
> how to's for staff, etc.
Like any other software, make a set of requirements and then go
looking. The order of those two steps is important, though you're
allowed to it
DokuWiki, redmine wiki, GitLab wiki parts.
Confluence.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig wrote:
> Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to
> / how to's for staff, etc.
>
> pro's
> con's
>
> We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced
> before it kicks the bucket and was l
Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to /
how to's for staff, etc.
pro's
con's
We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced
before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones.
thanks;
CPV
22 matches
Mail list logo
