Hi all,
I'm encountering a problem with a wireless STM-1 link which has a switch
connected at each end.
The wireless link has Gigabit Ethernet interfaces and so have my switches.
When I ping between the 2 switches via that wireless link I'm getting a lot
of pings that are
Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem
Sent from my phone
On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:05 PM, "Rens" wrote:
Hi all,
I'm encountering a problem with a wireless STM-1 link which has a
switch
connected at each end.
The wireless link has Gigabit Ethe
ed to look a little deeper and do some ping tests.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com]
Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45
To: Rens
Cc:
Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem
Sent from my phone
On S
arted to look a little deeper and do some ping tests.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com]
Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45
To: Rens
Cc:
Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem
Sent from my phone
On Sep
Yes all the radio RF levels are 100% ok.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Cheney [mailto:josh.che...@gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 12:47
To: Rens
Cc: 'Adam Goodman'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
I'm assuming that you have checked all
deeper and do some ping tests.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com]
> Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45
> To: Rens
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
>
> Sounds like this might be an Ethernet negotiaton problem
>
>
> All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex.
This takes the interface out of spec, IIRC. Try with auto-negotation
enabled.
--
Florian Weimer
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe
I have tried both actually, forced and auto, same issue
-Original Message-
From: Florian Weimer [mailto:fwei...@bfk.de]
Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 15:04
To: Rens
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
> All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex.
This ta
septembre 2009 15:04
> To: Rens
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
>
> > All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex.
>
> This takes the interface out of spec, IIRC. Try with auto-negotation
> enabled.
>
> --
> Florian Wei
Between 20 & 80 Mbps, no real relation between the problem and the time of a
day/higher/lower traffic
_
From: Kieran Murphy [mailto:da...@daffy.za.net]
Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 15:14
To: Rens
Cc: Florian Weimer; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
Whats
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:55:40AM +0200, Rens wrote:
> All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex.
I thought that with 1000T, you need to keep autonegotiation in place:
http://etherealmind.com/2008/07/15/ethernet-autonegotiation-works-why-how-standard-should-be-set/
"A major
Brian Reichert wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:55:40AM +0200, Rens wrote:
All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex.
I thought that with 1000T, you need to keep autonegotiation in place:
http://etherealmind.com/2008/07/15/ethernet-autonegotiation-works-why-how-standard-shoul
ckets are being
> dropped that pass via that link.
>
> That's why I started to look a little deeper and do some ping tests.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Goodman [mailto:a...@wispring.com]
> Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 11:45
> To: Rens
> Cc:
> Sub
Kenny Sallee wrote:
Seems everyone has focused on GE as the problem. You can quickly rule that
out by looking at interface error counters and doing PING tests from the
wireless router/device to something on the local network on both sides. If
OSPF is flapping because of missed HELLO packets t
ssage-
From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com]
Sent: September-10-09 12:35 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
Kenny Sallee wrote:
> Seems everyone has focused on GE as the problem. You can quickly rule
that
> out by looking at interface error counters and
I have the ability to enable 802.1p on the link, is there a way to
prioritize the OSPF hello packets with this?
_
From: Kenny Sallee [mailto:kenny.sal...@gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi 10 septembre 2009 18:06
To: Rens
Cc: Adam Goodman; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Wireless STM-1 link
O
16 matches
Mail list logo