Aaron Hopkins wrote:
>
> Try using nameservers on a different /24 and see if the problem goes
> away.
>
> -- Aaron
>
That's a good point. We've worked with Akamai in the past. Their CDN
solution works via DNS resolution. If your DNS servers are in Kansas,
you'l
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Dan White wrote:
We're experiencing very poor quality with You Tube, and it appears we're
subject to a bad entry within a geolocation database somewhere.
I'm not sure about Youtube, but Google seems to do some some clever but
annoying things with correlating requests going
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Harry Strongburg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:55:03PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> how has mtu got anything to do with packet path?
>
> PMTUD?
that won't change the destination based routed path, it'll cause the
endpoints to lower their MTU to a mut
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:55:03PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> how has mtu got anything to do with packet path?
PMTUD?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Harry Strongburg wrote:
> I had a similar issue, but it was mainly only over IPv6. According to
> someone I spoke to at Google, bumping up the MTU might help (and did
> help for me). I don't remember my previous MTU (I think it was 1280),
> but once I bumped it up
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:36:50PM -0500, Dan White wrote:
> We're experiencing very poor quality with You Tube, and it appears we're
> subject to a bad entry within a geolocation database somewhere.
>
> When we attempt to view videos, the contact comes back to us from IPs like:
>
> 208.117.226.2
On 21/04/11 15:46 -0700, Carl Rosevear wrote:
Quova, Maxmind, and others all return accurate results for everything of
ours I have tested. Some of the IPs in question have been properly assigned
or delegated to us for several years in whois. But yeah, thanks for the
input... I actually hadn't
-Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Rosevear [mailto:crosev...@skytap.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 6:19 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Youtube Geolocation
>
> I have had this same problem, followed Google's forms, etc... they never
>
they need to be manually updated. Unless I get a specific
request at my company I don't bother updating on a regular basis.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Carl Rosevear [mailto:crosev...@skytap.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 6:19 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Youtube Geol
I have had this same problem, followed Google's forms, etc... they never
seem to fix it. Its really annoying.
This is an epic fail on the part of Google in my opinion. My netblocks all
show Seattle in whois... my routing is obviously here... I don't think we
have an official address in the UK
We're experiencing very poor quality with You Tube, and it appears we're
subject to a bad entry within a geolocation database somewhere.
When we attempt to view videos, the contact comes back to us from IPs like:
208.117.226.21 (traceroute's through Frankfurt)
173.194.50.47
74.125.100.29
All of
11 matches
Mail list logo
