+1
- Eric
On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Michael Sinatra wrote:
> On 03/07/12 16:10, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
>>
>>> As a meta-comment: this "Quick Look" style of blog is an experiment we're
>>> trying, based on feedback that the community wanted t
On 03/07/12 16:10, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
As a meta-comment: this "Quick Look" style of blog is an experiment we're
trying, based on feedback that the community wanted to hear about more of these little
events as they happen. In a Quick Look, we
On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
> As a meta-comment: this "Quick Look" style of blog is an experiment we're
> trying, based on feedback that the community wanted to hear about more of
> these little events as they happen. In a Quick Look, we're giving the facts
> as they are known
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 18:29 , Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:19, Darius Jahandarie
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on specu
On Mar 7, 2012, at 18:29 , Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:19, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers wrote:
>>>
>>> Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation..
>>>
>>> - Greg
>>
>> Now all they need to do is link back to
On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:19, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers wrote:
>>
>> Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation..
>>
>> - Greg
>
> Now all they need to do is link back to this NANOG thread as a source.
That would be very irrespo
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie wrote:
>> http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/03/cogent-depeers-china-telecom.shtml
>>
>> cheers, --jim
>>
>
>
> Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation..
>
> - Greg
Now all
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen >wrote:
>
> > All -
> >
> > I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed
> from
> > cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone
> know
> > anythin
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen wrote:
> All -
>
> I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed from
> cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone know
> anything about this?We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic away
>
All -
I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed from
cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone know
anything about this?We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic away
from cogent for traffic to and from china telecom... Now cog
10 matches
Mail list logo