Re: dot xxx live or not?

2011-05-13 Thread Jorge Amodio
> You might be interested in this cool new technology called multicast. in this context you may be probably talking about anycast. there are few details but without digging in too much, there are at least two name servers for which the packets are flowing through the same exact route and end poin

Re: dot xxx live or not?

2011-05-13 Thread John Levine
>;; ANSWER SECTION: >xxx.300 IN NS a0.xxx.afilias-nst.info. >xxx.300 IN NS c0.xxx.afilias-nst.info. >xxx.300 IN NS a2.xxx.afilias-nst.info. >xxx.300 IN NS b0.xxx.

Re: dot xxx live or not?

2011-05-13 Thread Jorge Amodio
TLD is delegated and alive. pete@tango:~$ dig -t ns xxx ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> -t ns xxx ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47132 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;xxx.

Re: dot xxx live or not?

2011-05-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 05:03:11AM -0400, Joly MacFie wrote a message of 19 lines which said: > I recall checking at the time that http://icmregistry.xxx worked > > Now it doesn't. Anyone know what's going on? The TLD ".xxx" works. Names like sex.xxx or icmregistry.xxx have apparently been d

dot xxx live or not?

2011-05-13 Thread Joly MacFie
About a month ago it was announced that the xxx sTLD had "gone live" i.e. been added to the IANA root zone http://www.domainnamenews.com/registries/xxx-live-root-servers/9191 I recall checking at the time that http://icmregistry.xxx worked Now it doesn't. Anyone know what's going on? j -- ---