Re: is dnswl dead?

On Fri, 03 May 2019 00:55:17 -0500, Jose Manuel Vazquez Castro said: > And check first connectivity ping and telnet tcp ports 22 , 873 to ips > destination's from your linuxbox: > > Record A rsync2.dnswl.org > 139.162.192.198 > 142.44.243.216 > > Or use in the command directly the ip. > You are be

Re: is dnswl dead?

/subscribe On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:28 AM Jose Manuel Vazquez Castro wrote: > > And check first connectivity ping and telnet tcp ports 22 , 873 to ips > destination's from your linuxbox: > > Record A rsync2.dnswl.org > 139.162.192.198 > 142.44.243.216 > > Or use in the command directly the ip.

Re: is dnswl dead?

And check first connectivity ping and telnet tcp ports 22 , 873 to ips destination's from your linuxbox: Record A rsync2.dnswl.org 139.162.192.198 142.44.243.216 Or use in the command directly the ip. You are behinds a router, proxy , Nat device. May cause problems or deny filter traffic. If shar

Re: is dnswl dead?

Hi List files: rsync rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl Try exactly this command BIND: rsync --times rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl/bind-* /some/path/ El vie., 3 de mayo de 2019 0:23, Randy Bush escribió: > % /usr/local/bin/rsync --times rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl/bind-dnswl-nons.zone > /var/dns/primary/org.dn

Re: is dnswl dead?

> List files: > rsync rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl sorry. i am a little confused. are you trying to tell me how to use rsync or that dnswl is not broken for you? i am an rsync addict, and i still fear dnswl is broken. # rsync rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (54)

is dnswl dead?

% /usr/local/bin/rsync --times rsync2.dnswl.org::dnswl/bind-dnswl-nons.zone /var/dns/primary/org.dnswl rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (54) rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at io.c(785) [Receiver=3.1.3] this has been going on for a while. admins do not respond to email. and