On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:04:22 PST, andrew.wallace said:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated paper. I plan to review Ciscoâs architecture for lawful
intercept
Gadi Evron has
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
You apparently fail to understand that making other people's research well
known in the community is an important role. Would we be more secure, or
less secure, if somebody did the research, but then nobody told the owners
of
- Original Message
From: Brian Keefer ch...@smtps.net
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Cc: a.harrow...@gmail.com; andrew.wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
Sent: Fri, 5 February, 2010 1:55:58
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations
Andrew
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:47:47 -0600
Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm totally ignorant (most of the time), is anybody actually using SNMPv3 ?
I worked with an IPsec VPN product around 10 years ago that used SNMPv3
for automated provisioning of the tunnels.
Regards
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful
intercept and explain the approach a bad guy would take to getting
access without authorization. I’ll identify several aspects of the
design and implementation
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the associated
paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept and explain
the approach a bad guy would take to getting access without
(of course for any LEA that really cares they'll just order a phyiscal
tap, and provision things properly)
intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and
recommendations
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful
intercept and explain
On 2/4/2010 at 12:27 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated
paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept
and
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark crist.cl...@globalstar.com wrote:
this seems like much more work that matt blaze's work that said:
Just
send more than 10mbps toward what you want to sneak around... the
LEA's pipe is saturated so nothing of use gets to them
The Cross/XForce/IBM
I'm totally ignorant (most of the time), is anybody actually using SNMPv3 ?
Regards
On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark crist.cl...@globalstar.com
wrote:
this seems like much more work that matt blaze's work that said:
Just
send more than 10mbps toward what you want to sneak around... the
LEA's pipe is
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the
associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept
and explain the approach a bad guy would take to getting access without
-original message-
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations
From: andrew.wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
Date: 04/02/2010 11:09 pm
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote:
That peer-review is the basic purpose of my
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:25 PM, a.harrow...@gmail.com wrote:
-original message-
Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and
recommendations
From: andrew.wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com
Date: 04/02/2010 11:09 pm
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron g
On 04/02/10 15:58 -0800, andrew.wallace wrote:
CITATION NEEDED
You can goto Full-disclosure mailing list
http://www.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure/ and ask about Gadi Evron.
There will be plenty folks there who will tell you he is involved in
plagiarism.
Andrew
Security consultant
That's
Andrew
Security consultant
CITATION NEEDED
You can goto Full-disclosure mailing list
http://www.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure/ ...
Andrew
Security consultant
For clarity and transparency you were banned from that list for trolling
under the persona n3td3v.
--
bk
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm totally ignorant (most of the time), is anybody actually using SNMPv3 ?
sadly, if you are present in the US and you do ip services (public
ones) and you deployed a cisco device + calea capabilites, yes you do!
:(
-chris
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark crist.cl...@globalstar.com
wrote:
this seems like much more work that matt blaze's work that said:
Just
send more
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:26 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Crist Clark crist.cl...@globalstar.com
wrote:
this seems like much
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:42:24PM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
I can make a very good case that CALEA was not just originally intended
for voice, but was sold to Congress as something that didn't apply to data
networks. The EFF has said it better than I could, though, so look at
21 matches
Mail list logo
