On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:46:05 -0800, Michael Thomas said:
> Apparently the levine unit is hearing things again because nobody --
> least of all me -- has
> said anything about arc.
I believe it was a pre-emptive statement.
pgp2H7Fy1I06i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 11/29/2017 01:11 PM, John Levine wrote:
PPS: Please spare us pontification about why ARC can't possibly work
unless you're prepared to cite section numbers in the ARC spec
supporting your argument.
Apparently the levine unit is hearing things again because nobody --
least of all me -- has
On 11/29/2017 03:00 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
On 11/29/2017 03:46 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
You know what the original header was via the signature. You can take
the delta of the current subject line and remove any additions and
validate the signature. Whether you're happy with the
On 11/29/2017 03:46 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
You know what the original header was via the signature. You can take
the delta of the current subject line and
remove any additions and validate the signature. Whether you're happy
with the additions is a different concern,
Are you referring to
On 11/29/2017 02:40 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
On 11/29/2017 03:24 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Message footers and subject lines can be dealt with. That's already
been proven within the current DKIM spec.
Please humor my ignorance and explain how a subject line (which is
(over)signed)
On 11/29/2017 03:24 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Message footers and subject lines can be dealt with. That's already been
proven within the current DKIM spec.
Please humor my ignorance and explain how a subject line (which is
(over)signed) can be dealt with in the current DKIM spec?
I get how
On 11/29/2017 01:11 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article <1d458e76-ab61-db28-79cb-6aabcab4f...@mtcc.com> you write:
I've been saying for years that it should be possible to create the
concept of DKIM-friendly mailing lists. ...
I suppose, if your users are OK with no subject tags, message
In article <1d458e76-ab61-db28-79cb-6aabcab4f...@mtcc.com> you write:
>I've been saying for years that it should be possible to create the
>concept of DKIM-friendly mailing lists. ...
I suppose, if your users are OK with no subject tags, message footers,
or any of the other cruft that list users
8 matches
Mail list logo