On Friday, December 30, 2011 05:58:38 PM Vitkovsky, Adam
wrote:
> Actually an a Cisco presentation on Nexus 7k I asked
> whether it's possible to transport the FCoE over let's
> say EoMPLS or VPLS and did not get a straight answer
> though that was half a year ago -but it would be really
> cool t
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 07:24 -0500, Ray Soucy wrote:
> The speed of light is such a drag.
It could be worse... You could've been born on a larger planet.
> From: "Vitkovsky, Adam"
> -also there some attempts to actually send the information 50 micro sec
back in time
Please don't let the high-frequency stock traders get a hold of this.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Bonomi"
> > Of course there are still these issues with probabilities at quantum
> > level
>
> I *strongy* recommend that anyone pursuing this subject read Dr.
> Asimov's essays on resublimated thiotimoline.
As well as Spider Robinson's codicil...
C
> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Dec 30 07:03:54
> 2011
> From: "Vitkovsky, Adam"
> To: Ray Soucy , Tei
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:00:16 +0100
> Subject: RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:40:35 PST, Vadim Antonov said:
> faster than the speed of light. (The reality of FTL neutrino thingie is still
> too early to tell).
Especially if you actually *read* the actual journal article rather than the
pop-sci interpretation of it, it basically says "our experiment h
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 14:00 +0100, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
> Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore
Nope. The laws of physics as currently understood prohibit sending information
faster than the speed of light. (The reality of FTL neutrino thingie is still
too early
On 12/29/2011 9:06 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
(you forgot to change subj:)
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Next topic, ethernet is too chaotic and inefficient to deploy and support
mission critical applications in LAN or WAN or data center.
yes, let's get something wi
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> What we really need is a new method of sending data. The fact that I
> will never be able to send something from Maine to California in less
> than 15 ms is not acceptable.
>
> The speed of light is such a drag.
I propose that everyone on this
>From: Jared Mauch
>(I'm hoping for some good snow storms in the midwest/north east/NoVA
area to put some good stresses on the network for a week or so this
winter that can be measured/observed).
In DC and NoVA, the network which is most taxed by snow storms is the
transportation network. That
On Dec 30, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Tei wrote:
> I am not dumb, I know turning webpages into applications make
> webpages to fragile. But I am scared of javascripts. Javascript is
> just too dawmn usefull now, browsers too broken (mostly IE), and
> Javascript is like a superhero that fix all. The web
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Vitkovsky"
> Article by John Cramer says:
>
> At the AQRTP Workshop we considered the question of whether quantum
> nonlocality was a possible medium for FTL communication. In the
> context of standard quantum mechanics there is good reason for
> believ
only possibility seem to be modificaiton to QM equations
So fingers crossed :)
adam
-Original Message-
From: Aiden Sullivan [mailto:ai...@sullivan.in]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 2:09 PM
To: Vitkovsky, Adam
Cc: Ray Soucy; Tei; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: next-best-transport! down
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-communication_theorem
--
Aiden
On Dec 30 14:00, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
> Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore
>
> Just recently I heard about the experiments with "quantum nonlocality"
> no one seem to understand how it happens
Are you telling me that the 1,100 miles of fiber I just had run is
already obsolete? Someone is going to get fired over this.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam
wrote:
> Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore
>
> Just recently I heard about the exper
Well hopefully we won't need to worry about the speed of light anymore
Just recently I heard about the experiments with "quantum nonlocality"
no one seem to understand how it happens but for me it's enough it works
Basically when 2 photons or electrons are emitted form the same source -they
ar
PLS or VPLS and did not get a
>> straight answer though that was half a year ago
>> -but it would be really cool to connect hard-drives directly over continents
>>
>>
>> adam
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom Hill [mailto:t...@ninjaba
-but it would be really cool to connect hard-drives directly over continents
>
>
> adam
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Hill [mailto:t...@ninjabadger.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:58 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: next-best-transport! down wit
--Original Message-
From: Tom Hill [mailto:t...@ninjabadger.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:58 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:06 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> yes, let's get something with say fixed size
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 19:11, Randy Bush wrote:
> atm-2, aka mpls
I knew MPLS was fishy...
--
Darius Jahandarie
> yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
> predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP!
> Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this
> new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill!
atm-2, aka mpls
-transport! down with ethernet!
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:06 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
> predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP!
> Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:06 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
> predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP!
> Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this
> new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bi
(you forgot to change subj:)
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Next topic, ethernet is too chaotic and inefficient to deploy and support
> mission critical applications in LAN or WAN or data center.
yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
pred
24 matches
Mail list logo
