Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit curious, since
I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo. But the
table does not lie, a path of 174 3549 27595 is clearly transit. GX, care
to comment?
After poking for a bit,
Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit curious, since
I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo. But the
table does not lie, a path of 174 3549 27595 is clearly transit. GX, care
to comment?
After poking for a bit, it's unclear what, if
I'm not sure where that 58.65.238.0/24 prefix with AS3549
in the path came from. I *currently* see no BGP RIB entries
with AS 3549_27595 (GBLX Intercage) in the path.
A query for the past 6 hours yields 32 AS 27595 originated
prefixes, here are each with their associated upstream
ASN(s)
On Sep 7, 2008, at 8:16 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit
curious, since
I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo.
But the
table does not lie, a path of 174 3549 27595 is clearly
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595v=4view=2.0#AS27595
Gadi.
Or is it?
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Gadi Evron wrote:
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595v=4view=2.0#AS27595
Gadi.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or is it?
Looks to not be, so I call BS on your subject line..
however, I do see:
* 64.28.176.0/20 71.13.116.101 100 0 20115
19151 26769 27595 i
* 204.11.128.105100
Gadi,
A quick look at route-views will confirm that Atrivo is multi-homed.
And WV Fiber is a transit provider to them, not a peer.
As NANOG community members in good standing, I'm sure WV, nLayer, etc
would take the appropriate action if you were to contact their
respective abuse departments,
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Anton Kapela wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or is it?
Looks to not be, so I call BS on your subject line..
Thanks Anton! I appreciae you looking into it.
however, I do see:
* 64.28.176.0/20 71.13.116.101
On Sep 6, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Paul Wall wrote:
A quick look at route-views will confirm that Atrivo is multi-homed.
And WV Fiber is a transit provider to them, not a peer.
As NANOG community members in good standing, I'm sure WV, nLayer, etc
would take the appropriate action if you were to
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Anton Kapela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit curious, since
I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo. But
11 matches
Mail list logo
