If I was Comcast and I got this deal I'd set up scripts to continuously
spoof requests to Netflix, I mean hey I get paid for the traffic..
j
--
---
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
+1
In fact, I feel that at home, I need fast, reliable internet access. I wish I
could
get that from one provider. Unfortunately, instead, I get fast internet service
from Comcast (most of the time) and I get reliable internet service from
Raw Bandwidth (DSL, 1.5mbps/768k).
Owen
(Comcast
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
BTW, they rejected my very nice comment on their blog asking if they
would be willing to share the graphs of their transit provider
interfaces (which are NOT peering relationships, and not under NDA) to
back up their claims that the published graphs are false, so
Since it is Friday, maybe some of peering experts have some time to
speculate what this new approach proposed by Comcast might be, as they
assert it would represent a significant shift of Internet infrastructure.
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=202121
On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Loránd Jakab wrote:
Since it is Friday, maybe some of peering experts have some time to
speculate what this new approach proposed by Comcast might be, as they
assert it would represent a significant shift of Internet infrastructure.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Benson Schliesser
bens...@queuefull.net wrote:
I have no direct knowledge of the situation, but my guess: I suspect the
proposal was along the lines of longest-path / best-exit routing by Level(3).
In other words, if L(3) carries the traffic (most of the
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:15:14AM -0600, Benson Schliesser wrote:
I have no direct knowledge of the situation, but my guess: I suspect
the proposal was along the lines of longest-path / best-exit routing
by Level(3). In other words, if L(3) carries the traffic (most of the
way) to the
On Dec 17, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
... Level3 must think that their business
would be better off with regulatory oversight of peering, or they
would not have taken this action.
And they might be correct in thinking that, if we assume the peering ecosystem
is changing i.e.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Richard A Steenbergen
r...@e-gerbil.net wrote:
advertising MEDs, or by sending inconsistent routes. The fact that the
existing Level3/Comcast routing DOESN'T make Level 3 haul all of the
bits to the best exit mean it's highly likely that Comcast agreeing to
On Dec 17, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Benson Schliesser
bens...@queuefull.net wrote:
I have no direct knowledge of the situation, but my guess: I suspect the
proposal was along the lines of longest-path / best-exit routing by
Level(3). In
http://fcc.gov/
NOTICE: The FCC website and related electronic filing systems and documents
(except for NORS) will be unavailable beginning 6:00 p.m. (EST) Friday,
December 17 through 6:00 a.m. (EST) Monday, December 20 for scheduled
maintenance.
:(
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Steve
http://blog.comcast.com/2010/12/comcasts-responds-to-level-3s-fcc-filing.html
On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
http://fcc.gov/
NOTICE: The FCC website and related electronic filing systems and documents
(except for NORS) will be unavailable beginning 6:00 p.m. (EST) Friday,
On 12/18/2010 12:38 AM, Steve Schultze wrote:
http://blog.comcast.com/2010/12/comcasts-responds-to-level-3s-fcc-filing.html
I very much doubt whether my comment on the blog will survive their
moderation process, so here it is:
===
I am a Comcast residential HSI customer, and have many clients
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:07:15AM -0500, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Note that Comcast has never said that the Level3/Netflix issue is
about users exceeding their allotted bandwidth (currently at about
250GB/month for residential); presumably, were a Comcast user to use
249GB of bandwidth
14 matches
Mail list logo
