>> We are using the same code that RIPE is using at http://certtest.ripe.net.
>> RIPE has been very kind to allow us to use their code. As for ARIN,
>> this is a pilot and is certainly not a final fixed-feature set. The
>> first go of this is the "hosted" solution where an ISP can come into
>> ARI
> The current effort will only allow for ipv6 objects
> (route6/inet6num).
s/allow for/add support for/
i hope
> We are using the same code that RIPE is using at http://certtest.ripe.net.
> RIPE has been very kind to allow us to use their code. As for ARIN,
> this is a pilot and is certainly no
Hi Sandy
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05:20PM -0400, Sandy Murphy wrote:
> The presentation said that ARIN would be doing a lot of work to
> improve the IRR. The last I asked, the ARIN IRR did not support the
> RPSS (Routing Policy System Security - RFC2725). RIPE supports this,
> I know. Will the
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:51 -0700, kris foster a écrit :
> On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:05 -0400, Sandy Murphy a écrit :
> >> This message is sent to the whole nanog list, rather than the
> >> nanog-attendees list,
> >
> > How come there
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 15:49 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu a écrit :
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:35:53 +0200, Michael Hallgren said:
>
> > How come there is a nanog-attendees list disjunct from the nanog list.
> > Wouldn't it be natural to broadcast any kind of content to the
> > entire community?
Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:05 -0400, Sandy Murphy a écrit :
This message is sent to the whole nanog list, rather than the
nanog-attendees list,
How come there is a nanog-attendees list disjunct from the nanog list.
Wouldn't it be natural to broadcast any kind of
On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:05 -0400, Sandy Murphy a écrit :
This message is sent to the whole nanog list, rather than the
nanog-attendees list,
How come there is a nanog-attendees list disjunct from the nanog list.
Wouldn't it be natural
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:35:53 +0200, Michael Hallgren said:
> How come there is a nanog-attendees list disjunct from the nanog list.
> Wouldn't it be natural to broadcast any kind of content to the
> entire community?
Umm... "Presentation XYZ has been moved from the Blue Room to the Paisley Room"
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:05 -0400, Sandy Murphy a écrit :
> This message is sent to the whole nanog list, rather than the
> nanog-attendees list,
How come there is a nanog-attendees list disjunct from the nanog list.
Wouldn't it be natural to broadcast any kind of content to the
entire community
This message is sent to the whole nanog list, rather than the
nanog-attendees list, as I'm not sure who would be watching that
list when the conference is over.
I stood up to ask a question at the end of Mark Koster's presentation
yesterday, but before I got to the end of the table, he was being
10 matches
Mail list logo
