Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

Rob Seastrom writes: > goe...@anime.net writes: > >> "Note ARIN has attempted to validate the data for this POC, but has received >> no response from the POC since 2013-11-06" >> >> So if the owner does not care to respond to ARIN, what now? > > POC validation has an extraordinarily low success

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

goe...@anime.net writes: > "Note ARIN has attempted to validate the data for this POC, but has received > no response from the POC since 2013-11-06" > > So if the owner does not care to respond to ARIN, what now? POC validation has an extraordinarily low success rate (under 50% if memory serves

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

You can't get their IP space revoked just because you got a stupid response from a confused/uneducated/overworked abuse handler. If you could, Yahoo and Hotmail would have been shut down ages ago. :) On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 goe...@anime.net wrote: i reported abuse to them that was originating d

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Bill Woodcock wrote: Speaking individually, not with my ARIN board hat on: If you???d like to report the address to ab...@arin.net, an ARIN postmaster can contact the web.com POC, and get an authoritative answer. Very interesting: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-209-1

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

This is just a typical "Drop the bomb, and soften the blow" technique. On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: > Show them the Whois info and that might change their mind. Asking to > reclaim the space is silly. > > -mel > > > On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:53 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote: > >

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

Show them the Whois info and that might change their mind. Asking to reclaim the space is silly. -mel > On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:53 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote: > > i reported abuse to them that was originating directly from > 209.17.115.109, they responded stating they have no control over the or

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:53 PM, wrote: > i reported abuse to them that was originating directly from > 209.17.115.109, they responded stating they have no control over the origin > IP and that i should look up the IP in arin to get the owner. it kind of sounds like they are confused and maybe a

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

> On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:53 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote: > > i reported abuse to them that was originating directly from > 209.17.115.109, they responded stating they have no control over the origin > IP and that i should look up the IP in arin to get the owner. > > -Dan > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015,

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

i reported abuse to them that was originating directly from 209.17.115.109, they responded stating they have no control over the origin IP and that i should look up the IP in arin to get the owner. -Dan On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Mel Beckman wrote: What makes you think they are disavowing ownershi

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

kinda looks like their routers still ask it to be routed to them: 19871 | 209.17.112.0 | NETWORK-SOLUTIONS-HOSTING - Network Solutions, LLC,US and stat.ripe.net: the 2 /21's are 19871 originated, with the last /24 from 36476 (web.

Re: reclaiming arin IP allocations?

What makes you think they are disavowing ownership? Did they state that to you personally, or are you inferring that from other information? -mel beckman > On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:36 PM, "goe...@anime.net" wrote: > > web.com/netsol is disavowing ownership of 209.17.115.109. > > NetRange:

reclaiming arin IP allocations?

web.com/netsol is disavowing ownership of 209.17.115.109. NetRange: 209.17.112.0 - 209.17.127.255 CIDR: 209.17.112.0/20 NetName:WEB-COM-BLK3 NetHandle: NET-209-17-112-0-1 Parent: NET209 (NET-209-0-0-0-0) What is the process to get this netblock reclaimed? -D