-ipv6.com" or "test-ipv6.com/helpdesk". There's also a
document floating around that we're encouraging people to contribute
to, specifically to be used by help desks, if you're interested.
https://git.steffann.nl/go6/ipv6-troubleshooting-for-helpdesks/blob/master/IPv6-t
Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant
(407) 257-5115
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jason Fesler
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 12:52 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: First ISP-hosted "transparent" test-IPv6.com mirror
TL:DR? “Thank
TL:DR? “Thanks, Comcast!” and “Who’s Next?”
The test-ipv6.com site started out 4 years ago, at a table in Seattle,
after an IPv6 round table meeting hosted by Internet Society. John
Brzozowski and myself were each trying to come up with a way to help
end users figure out that their IPv6 internet
> What's really needed is a service that looks up a given web page
> over IPv6 from behind a 1280 byte MTU link and reports if all the
> elements load or not. It dumps a list of elements with success/fail.
>
> This would be useful to send the idiots that block ICMPv6 PTB yet
> send packets bigger
http://ipv6chicken.com/ tests the path to me. It doesn't check the
path back to the sites I want to reach though it does provide a
independent third party if there is complainst that PTB's are not
being generated. It would be useful if it reported the MTU that
was eventually used. Most OS's hav
My bad... It's .com not .net.
http://www.ipv6chicken.com
Owen
On Jun 4, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2012-06-04 16:58, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> http://ipv6chicken.net
>
> $ dig -t any ipv6chicken.net
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> -t any ipv6chicken.net
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;
's/net/com'
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , Owen DeLong
> writes:
>> http://ipv6chicken.net
>>
>> Owen
>
> doesn't exist.
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.1 <<>> ipv6chicken.net
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN,
In message , Owen DeLong
writes:
> http://ipv6chicken.net
>
> Owen
doesn't exist.
; <<>> DiG 9.9.1 <<>> ipv6chicken.net
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 5059
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT
On 2012-06-04 16:58, Owen DeLong wrote:
> http://ipv6chicken.net
$ dig -t any ipv6chicken.net
; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> -t any ipv6chicken.net
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 16935
The chicken cannot cross the road as the chicken does no
http://ipv6chicken.net
Owen
On Jun 4, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> What's really needed is a service that looks up a given web page
> over IPv6 from behind a 1280 byte MTU link and reports if all the
> elements load or not. It dumps a list of elements with success/fail.
>
> This
Much of that can be found here: http://www.wand.net.nz/pmtud/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 6:54 PM
To: Jeroen Massar
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: test-ipv6.com / omgipv6day.com down
What's really needed is a se
What's really needed is a service that looks up a given web page
over IPv6 from behind a 1280 byte MTU link and reports if all the
elements load or not. It dumps a list of elements with success/fail.
This would be useful to send the idiots that block ICMPv6 PTB yet
send packets bigger than 1280
On 2012-06-04 08:13, Jason Fesler wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
>> You got a bunch of mirrors for it right? Should not be to tricky to
>> get someone to let their act as the real thing for a bit.
>
> I've got redirects up now to spread the load across VMs. For t
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> You got a bunch of mirrors for it right? Should not be to tricky to get
> someone to let their act as the real thing for a bit.
I've got redirects up now to spread the load across VMs. For the next couple
of days, I don't expect a single VM
On 4 Jun 2012, at 06:50, Jason Fesler wrote:
> I know a lot of people are using / pointing to test-ipv6.com . The hardware
> picked a bad week to quit sniffing glue.
You got a bunch of mirrors for it right? Should not be to tricky to get someone
to let their act as the real thing for
I know a lot of people are using / pointing to test-ipv6.com . The hardware
picked a bad week to quit sniffing glue.
I"ll be working on trying to get it back up today, I need to source hardware.
Also looking at borrowing a VM for short term.
(speaking only for @test-ipv6.com, no
t;From the oh so helpful FAQ @ http://test-ipv6.com/faq.html
8<-
Q: Why is this web site reachable via IPv4 only?
You're right, there are no records, intentionally. A percentage of
users are unable to browse sites
On 01/28/2011 05:29 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Does this site have an record? If so, my DNS does not pick it up.
It does not and explains why on its FAQ:
http://test-ipv6.com/faq.html
--
Kevin Stange
Chief Technology Officer
Steadfast Networks
http://steadfast.net
Phone: 312-602-2689
Does this site have an record? If so, my DNS does not pick it up.
> [root@ns1 ~]# dig AAAA test-ipv6.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 <<>> test-ipv6.com
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEA
In message <4d4280da.8090...@steadfast.net>, Kevin Stange writes:
> On 01/27/2011 06:16 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > In message , Jason F=
> esler wr
> > ites:
> >> Several people have suggested I (re)post information about test-ipv6.c=
> om=20
>
On 01/27/2011 06:16 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message , Jason Fesler
> wr
> ites:
>> Several people have suggested I (re)post information about test-ipv6.com
>> here.
>>
>> http://test-ipv6.com ..
>>tests ipv4 and ipv6 by dns name
>>tes
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 6:25 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
>>
>> Anyone for peering cake?
>>
>
> Yeah, Google, HE, Cogent, Sprint, Qwest, and Level3 all need peering cakes
> (as I'm pretty sure there is no participant in that list which is connected
> t
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:59:15PM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 6:25 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> >
> >Anyone for peering cake?
> >
>
> Yeah, Google, HE, Cogent, Sprint, Qwest, and Level3 all need peering
> cakes (as I'm pretty sure there is no participant in that list which is
>
In message , Jason Fesler wr
ites:
> > Note you can have totally broken IPv6 connectivity and still be
> > fine on World IPv6 day. You just need applications with good
> > multi-homing support.
>
> Agreed so far.
>
> > No web site can check this for you.
>
> Hmm. What's wrong with asking the b
On 1/27/2011 6:25 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Anyone for peering cake?
Yeah, Google, HE, Cogent, Sprint, Qwest, and Level3 all need peering
cakes (as I'm pretty sure there is no participant in that list which is
connected to every other participant in that list). If you could bake
Qwest
Note you can have totally broken IPv6 connectivity and still be
fine on World IPv6 day. You just need applications with good
multi-homing support.
Agreed so far.
No web site can check this for you.
Hmm. What's wrong with asking the browser to try a dual-stack url today,
as a proxy for what
On 28/01/2011, at 10:46 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> d.
>>
>> Please direct any comments, flames, etc directly to me instead of the
>> list. I've added enough noise already :-)
>
> Note you can have totally broken IPv6 connectivity and still be
> fine on World IPv6 day. You just need applicati
In message , Jason Fesler wr
ites:
> Several people have suggested I (re)post information about test-ipv6.com
> here.
>
> http://test-ipv6.com ..
>tests ipv4 and ipv6 by dns name
>tests dual stack (will the client break on World IPv6 Day?)
>tests ipv6 by IP lit
Several people have suggested I (re)post information about test-ipv6.com
here.
http://test-ipv6.com ..
tests ipv4 and ipv6 by dns name
tests dual stack (will the client break on World IPv6 Day?)
tests ipv6 by IP literal (teredo can pass this)
gives advice to end user about current
29 matches
Mail list logo
