Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread George Herbert
I am as amused by antispam efforts as anyone, but can we stay on list topic? George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone On Jun 13, 2012, at 19:39, Owen DeLong wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > > On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Joe Greco wrote: > >>> A trick to do on mail (USPS) spammers is ta

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Owen DeLong
Sent from my iPad On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Joe Greco wrote: >> A trick to do on mail (USPS) spammers is take the prepaid mailing = >> envelope they often include and tape it to a brick wrapped in brown = >> paper and drop it off at the post office. They have to pay the shipping. = >> If en

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Joe Greco
> A trick to do on mail (USPS) spammers is take the prepaid mailing = > envelope they often include and tape it to a brick wrapped in brown = > paper and drop it off at the post office. They have to pay the shipping. = > If enough people do it, they go out of business. That's simply false; local p

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Greg Ihnen
A trick to do on mail (USPS) spammers is take the prepaid mailing envelope they often include and tape it to a brick wrapped in brown paper and drop it off at the post office. They have to pay the shipping. If enough people do it, they go out of business. In this case, do anything you can to wa

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Lynda
On 6/13/2012 3:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote: NANOG, i strongly desire to restrain this slimeball idiot's trade. please tell me if you have any ideas on how to do so. I have plenty of ideas. Unfortunately, I am not permitted to do those things. I promise it would not be painful, though. I'm not crue

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Randy Epstein
Folks, This content is great .. for another list. I know you're not happy with receiving unsolicited mail, and yes, it's likely your addresses were scraped from either the mailing list itself or various archives that are kept, but this list is not the best place to discuss this. Please refrain f

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Charles Morris
Don't get me wrong, I greatly dislike spam, but next thing you know it will be against the law to send packets to someone you don't have consent from... or hand out pamphlets / talk to someone on the street you don't have consent from... I figure the solution here that fits with the best interests

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4fd91056.3030...@foobar.org>, Nick Hilliard writes: > >> Be advised that Im following your posts and have your threating > >> messages to me. If there is an ddos or restraint of trade due to my > >> ACCIDENTAL email I'll escalate to commerce and FBI. > > 1. spam a big pile of network

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread jim deleskie
Accidental, he didn't mean to get caught :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Richard Golodner wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:05 +0900, >> ACCIDENTAL email > > How can my company get six accidental emails? Not even an idiot sends > six emails by mistake. > > Spammertechnology labs is more like

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Nick Hilliard
>> Be advised that Im following your posts and have your threating >> messages to me. If there is an ddos or restraint of trade due to my >> ACCIDENTAL email I'll escalate to commerce and FBI. 1. spam a big pile of network operators 2. threaten legals on aforementioned prospective customers 3. pr

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Richard Golodner
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:05 +0900, > ACCIDENTAL email How can my company get six accidental emails? Not even an idiot sends six emails by mistake. Spammertechnology labs is more like it.

Re: very confusing.

2012-06-13 Thread Randy Bush
NANOG, i strongly desire to restrain this slimeball idiot's trade. please tell me if you have any ideas on how to do so. --- > Be advised that Im following your posts and have your threating > messages to me. If there is an ddos or restraint of trade due to my > ACCIDENTAL email I'll escalate to