On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:09 -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
On 30-Oct-2007, at 12:55, Andy Davidson wrote:
I would support the creation of a mail-operators list ( agenda time
for a mailops bof, since a lot of networks are small enough to mean
that netops and sysops are often the same guys) if
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 04:51 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Lucy,
What is your opinion on Randy Bush's latest post to the NANOG List?
Are you possibly referring to the one about Abha Ahuja?
-Jim P.
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:24 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
http://rip.psg.com/~randy/mlc-complaint.mbox
Can't we all just get along.
Look, Randy's comment was a bit gruff (although deeply humorous to quite
a few folks). Considering it was made at 2AM I'd have to say that it's
not as bad as I've
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 05:54 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:24 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
Considering it was made at 2AM
i am in tokyo
randy
:-) well, I read your emails in Atlanta at 2am and your late-night
attitude really shows through even though
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 18:46 -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Just so we're clear, you will continue to see requests to adapt to the
AUP wrt to being on topic. If you don't like that, you can certainly
seek to have me thrown off the MLC. In fact, I encourage it. :-)
I think that is Randy's
Anybody know who [EMAIL PROTECTED] is?
Every post I make to nanog* I eventually get one of these blowback
emails:
-
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 16:14 -0700, Lynda wrote:
I just hate politics, hurt feelings, and other stuff, so I'm asking here
first. There's a nice NANOG 40 link on the front of the Wiki, but that's
over. I'm thinking it ought not to disappear, but rather move off to a
Prior NANOG Meetings
