Mail seems to be one of those topics which is of interest to many nanog
subscribers, but simultaneously annoying to many (presumably different)
nanog subscribers.
what large subject does not fall in this category? this is just life
when you have a large community.
randy
The NANOG mailing list has never been in good order.
The NANOG meetings have always had complaints.
The NANOG community is composed of disparate parties with disparate
interests, each convinced that their interests are the only ones of
operation relevance.
it would all be so much simpler
dunce cap on
irrelevant to the mlc action, but ...
as someone just pointed out to me, i was confusing two ex-ceos of qwest,
joe nacchio, who is a convicted felon, with sol trujillo, who is not,
but is currently the ceo of telstra.
apologies.
randy
http://rip.psg.com/~randy/mlc-complaint.mbox
Lynda wrote:
I just hate politics, hurt feelings, and other stuff, so I'm asking here
first. There's a nice NANOG 40 link on the front of the Wiki, but that's
over. I'm thinking it ought not to disappear, but rather move off to a
Prior NANOG Meetings (there's some great links to restaurants
I don't know how many people that attended NANOG in Toronto had to go
through the international travel approval that some of us had to.
probably not the canadians.
this is NAnog, not USnog, so that's just gonna be a fact of life.
perhaps we saw a huge attendance dip at Toronto
the opposite
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg45167.html is
about volume.
for me, it's not the volume, per se. it is the shameless and (should
be) embarrassing self-promotion, the copying and reposting of others'
ideas and work, ... and it's not only gadi, but he makes such a good
