Re: The year gone by: The PC

2006-10-14 Thread Martin Hannigan
At 06:35 PM 10/14/2006, Randy Bush wrote: great. reconcile this with your previous point. The point was made with the Daly reference to the process. -M< -- Martin Hannigan(c) 617-388-2663 Renesys Corporation(w) 617-395-8574 M

Re: The year gone by: The PC

2006-10-14 Thread Randy Bush
a. losing the research component was a mistake (can kc come back?) uh, has dr feamster, jen's replacement, not published enough good ops-oriented research to satisfy you? b. there are continued politics as exemplified by the Feamster appointment which was justified as 'not precluded in th

Re: The year gone by: The PC

2006-10-14 Thread Martin Hannigan
At 06:19 PM 10/14/2006, Martin Hannigan wrote: I noticed that Montreal is already posted. Congratulations Merit and everyone. That is a precedent worth noting. Toronto. I typed in Toronto and the list changed it to Montreal. :-) -M< -- Martin Hannigan

The year gone by: The PC

2006-10-14 Thread Martin Hannigan
I think the PC did okay all considered. a. losing the research component was a mistake (can kc come back?) b. there are continued politics as exemplified by the Feamster appointment which was justified as 'not precluded in the Charter', but it was still an inadequate response consideri