On 12/3/07, Martin Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the second time someone from the Program Committee has posted
> something that seemed to be asking for something to help our success
> or informing people about standard (revenue generating even) functions
> of NANOG and that they b
This is the second time someone from the Program Committee has posted
something that seemed to be asking for something to help our success
or informing people about standard (revenue generating even) functions
of NANOG and that they believe that these types of emails related to
the conference progr
Hi folks,
This is a reminder to submit presentations for NANOG42 in San Jose, CA
to be held February 2008. Quality abstracts have been arriving over
the past month. A few people promised to send along presentations in
December. If anyone has a work in progress to submit please do so
now. The p
