Re: [Nanog-futures] Media at NANOG conferences

2008-07-22 Thread Philip Smith
Steve Meuse said the following on 18/7/08 06:47: Philip Smith expunged ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): We'd like to hear the community's opinion on this. We've drafted a Media Policy based on what other events like ours do; see the attachment below... Any opinions? Constructive suggestions? I'm

Re: [Nanog-futures] Bhutan discovers the NANOG Problem...

2008-07-14 Thread Philip Smith
Robert Seastrom said the following on 7/7/08 05:16: It seems that Bhutan is having trouble with web surfing and gaming during their sessions: http://uk.reuters.com/article/technologyNewsMolt/idUKB12933220080630 It is a thought though... Should we try a NANOG without network or power

Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?

2008-02-25 Thread Philip Smith
Hi Patrick, Patrick W. Gilmore said the following on 25/2/08 11:00: Let's stop dancing around the issue. There was discussion regarding the Peering BoF amongst the SC PC. There is no reason to hide this fact - just the opposite. And there were at least some provisional outcomes

Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?

2008-02-24 Thread Philip Smith
Hi Richard, Richard A Steenbergen said the following on 25/2/08 08:21: Making a special exemption for Bill Norton (a member of the SC, which elects the PC) could easily give the impression of undue favoritism to the outside world, and defeat all of the work that has been put into