On May 31, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Ren Provo wrote:
> Pretty sure there is no need for Jerry Springer-antics. Give it time
> as requested by many.
I haven't read this sentiment from anyone. URL please.
> This could be a mutual decision to prepare for
> the option you listed as 'c'.
>
>
> On Mon,
Understood Manish. I am hoping to reduce the stark debates some yearn
for via reminders that both sides may desire adjustments. Long-term
planning is what (I believe) the next step is and beyond-2011 Merit
involvement is where Don should weigh in at the community meeting.
Cheers! -ren
On Mon, Ma
Hi Ren,
I believe Don already addressed this particular question regarding
the relevance of NANOG to the Merit mission in his April 17th post
to the nanog-futures mailing list.
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-futures/2010-April/000745.html
Were you looking for additional clarification
Pretty sure there is no need for Jerry Springer-antics. Give it time
as requested by many. This could be a mutual decision to prepare for
the option you listed as 'c'.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:13 PM, William Norton wrote:
> I do look forward to hear what Don has to say, but it sounds like Mer
I do look forward to hear what Don has to say, but it sounds like Merit is the
passive one here - " we will do what the community wants" and all that.
It seems like the side that has ambitions to take over the meeting is actually
the one in the spotlight to demonstrate to the community that it
Hi Bill,
I suspect that Merit, with stimulus funding in hand, may have other
non-NANOG interests at this point. I hope you are able to attend the
community meeting and that Don Welch will clarify Merit's long-term
interest. Cheers, -ren
2010/5/31 William Norton :
>
On May 31, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Tim Yocum wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> First email to -announce:
>
> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-announce/2010-April/77.html
>
> And the resulting threads here:
>
> http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-futures/2010-April/thread.html
>
> That's what
Hi Bill,
First email to -announce:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-announce/2010-April/77.html
And the resulting threads here:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-futures/2010-April/thread.html
That's what has been published so far, with more details promised in the near
fut
Hi all -
I must have missed the announcement about NANOG changing hands. Can someone
point me to the URL where the background, motivation, and plan are described to
the NANOG Community?
Thanks.
Bill
___
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog
