(Here is the complete email)
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:30 -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> We should be advertising the changes to the list and vet what few core
> options need to be vetted.
My recommendations:
Under: Admin -> Content Filtering
* filter_content = Yes
* filter_mime_type
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:30 -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> We should be advertising the changes to the list and vet what few core
> options need to be vetted.
My recommendations:
Under: Admin -> Content Filtering
* filter_content = Yes
* filter_mime_types = application/ms-tnef
On Jan 2, 2008 12:16 PM, Sean Figgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lynda wrote:
> > Okay, so we've moved to mailman for nanog. Mailman has a nice feature
> > that will turn all rich text/mime/html garbage into nice honest text.
> > Any chance that it will be implemented? It's one of the things I li
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Lynda wrote:
> I'm quite disappointed. You are correct. Still, perhaps it will be
> encouragement for them to move the other lists to mailman. Another
> nicety that mailman has is the ability to say send me only one message,
> when people use reply-all, and send multiple copies
Sean Figgins wrote:
>Lynda wrote:
>
>
>>[mailman for nanog]
>>
>>
>
>It also reduces the size of the digest version, if anyone chooses to use
>the digest instead.
>
>I just checked the headers, though, and believe that the main list is
>still using majordomo. This list has been mailman fo
Lynda wrote:
> Okay, so we've moved to mailman for nanog. Mailman has a nice feature
> that will turn all rich text/mime/html garbage into nice honest text.
> Any chance that it will be implemented? It's one of the things I like
> about mailman. It certainly makes mailing lists more pleasant, an
Okay, so we've moved to mailman for nanog. Mailman has a nice feature
that will turn all rich text/mime/html garbage into nice honest text.
Any chance that it will be implemented? It's one of the things I like
about mailman. It certainly makes mailing lists more pleasant, and has
the bonus of r
