> >I don't know anything about NUnit's internals, nor do I know what
they
> >pretended to do, but right now, this doesn't look good and puts a bit
> >of a showstopper in nant :(
> >
> We could try posting to the NUnit dev list and see what they say.
Yes, this seems like either:
1. We are missi
Tomas Restrepo wrote:
Hi guys...
I don't know anything about NUnit's internals, nor do I know what they
pretended to do, but right now, this doesn't look good and puts a bit of a
showstopper in nant :(
We could try posting to the NUnit dev list and see what they say.
Ian
I forgot to add that, right now, can't find a way to get the tests in
nantcontrib to compile... TblTaskTest derives from Nant's BaseTest class,
which was modified to fit into NUnit2, and if I modify everything in
nantcontrib to suite NUnit2, I can't run the tests anymore from the
buildfile... talk
Hi guys...
I've been updating tonight the NAntContrib code to use the new NUnit2 tests,
and quite quickly ran into a gotcha with the new assemblyname attibute: It
is exactly that, an assembly name, and cannot take an assembly _file_ name.
In fact, the build files for nant itself pass in an assemb
