Re: [nant-dev] cvs re-org

2003-06-05 Thread Ian MacLean
Jean's patch has been comitted. I haven't looked at the failonerror issue with the exec task though. Ian Great! Have the pending patches been included (e.g. bug-fix in the task)? I included them in my local copy of NAnt last week, so I need to know if I have to include them again... Gius_. >

RE: [nant-dev] cvs re-org

2003-06-05 Thread Greco Giuseppe
Title: RE: [nant-dev] cvs re-org Great! Have the pending patches been included (e.g. bug-fix in the task)? I included them in my local copy of NAnt last week, so I need to know if I have to include them again... Gius_. > -Original Message- > From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: [nant-dev] exec ignores failonerror?

2003-06-05 Thread John Barstow
After some more investigation, it's not that it's being ignored - it's that when the build fails, the exec task sits there waiting for someone to hit enter. I can't figure out why - it doesn't sit there when the build succeeds. -Original Message- From: John Barstow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

[nant-dev] exec ignores failonerror?

2003-06-05 Thread John Barstow
Using the following target: I would expect the mail task to be called even when the build fails. This is not happening. Can anyone explain/fix this. Using nant 0.8.2 John Barstow Senior Developer Grosvenor Financial Services Group Ltd ---

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt & CVS Directories

2003-06-05 Thread Ian MacLean
Good call Erv. I'd completely forgotten that foreach supported filesets. Ian Foreach already supports filesets. Search the nant archives for a couple discussions that exactly solve this problem (of recursively building) using foreach filesets. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]