Re: [nant-dev] RE: NAnt version number

2003-07-10 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: "John Barstow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Gert Driesen'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Nant-Developers (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:50 AM Subject: [nant-dev] RE: NAnt version number > Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I

RE: [nant-dev] For review - 0.8.3 rc1 release notes

2003-07-10 Thread John Barstow
I've incorporated everyone's comments and am rolling the tarball now. Thanks for the feedback. John C Barstow --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free boo

[nant-dev] RE: NAnt version number

2003-07-10 Thread John Barstow
Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm not sure about this, but wasn't it the intention to using the following > version numbering scheme : > ...YMMDD > eg. 0.8.3.30710 (if a release would be built today) ? > Or do you have another proposal ? I will be recording the RC and release

Re: [nant-dev] Problem with the task

2003-07-10 Thread Giuseppe Greco
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 22:33, Giuseppe Greco wrote: > Hi all, Ah, I've also checked out the latest version of Mono from CVS... Gius_. > > I've checked out the latest version of NAnt from > CVS right now... and the task doesn't function > correctly anymore. This is my task: > >input="${modu

[nant-dev] Problem with the task

2003-07-10 Thread Giuseppe Greco
Hi all, I've checked out the latest version of NAnt from CVS right now... and the task doesn't function correctly anymore. This is my task: The resulting .resource file is not placed in the directory specified in the todir property. Instead, the generated file is just saved into the current d

[nant-dev] Behavior of New Solution Task

2003-07-10 Thread Aaron Jensen
I just got a build working of NAnt version 0.8.4 so I could use the new solution task. Much to my surprise, I noticed that all dll files referenced by my projects are copied into my build directory (approximately 111 of them), including all the System.*.dll files! Is this normal behavior? Should

[nant-dev] NAnt version number

2003-07-10 Thread Gert Driesen
John, I'm not sure about this, but wasn't it the intention to using the following version numbering scheme : ...YMMDD eg. 0.8.3.30710 (if a release would be built today) ? Or do you have another proposal ? Are we currently keeping track of the version numbers (the revision numbers actually) of