--- Begin Message ---
Well, I'm back from vacation and my workload has reverted to normal levels.
Unfortunately, I seem to be unable to post to the list for some reason.
If you receive this, please forward it to the list; I'm going to try posting
from my home account tonight.
I note that the build file for the latest release of NDoc seems to detect
the various framework profiles; perhaps we could use that logic to detect a
usable profile when the default profile is not available.
------ Here is your List of Failed Recipients ------
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail Server is down or unreachable.
-------- Here Is Your Returned Mail --------
I would suggest we make it 0.9, since the code base seems to be stabilizing,
but will be happy to give it any other number people can agree on.
If there are no objections, I'll start getting everything to compile and
test properly.
The questions I think that need to be addressed for this release are:
Is the <solution> task stable yet? We probably don't want to release until
people are reasonably happy with how it works.
Will we upgrade NUnit or NDoc for this release? I'll spend some time trying
to get
NUnit 2.1 compiled with the 1.0 profile.
Will we continue to default to the 1.0 profile, or do we want to switch the
default to the 1.1 profile? I vote 1.1, but it doesn't matter as long as
we've fixed the bug that John Lam notes with 0.8.3
(http://www.iunknown.com/000342.html).
--- End Message ---
