Just in case the attachments for the two patches I just submitted did not make
it to the list, they are also available from the sourceforge "Patches" feature
accessible from the main page.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=31650&atid=402870
James.
Here is a patch that adds two badly needed features (well..., at least for me
:-)) to the task.
One is resultproperty, which is used to specify a property that will receive the
exit code of the process (it more useful when failonerror is false).
The other one is outputproperty, which is used to
DependsTask Patch
Here is an implementation of the task. It allows the use of dynamic
dependencies which was possible with earlier versions of NAnt through the
task, but with current changes is now longer allowed (deprecation of
the force attribute).
It is particularly useful for handling depe
This is a good thing. We should have enabled this some time ago.
Ian
As a sideefect to enable this I have to enable also use of type-defs in
TaskContainer (used in and )
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an
> The method Martin proposed has been discussed before. It would be tidier
> from a user point of view to allow adding to filesets without a seperate
> task - maybe using the mode attribute on the fileset itself
>
>
>
>
>
hmm - mode attribute could be maybe a little tidier than
The method Martin proposed has been discussed before. It would be tidier
from a user point of view to allow adding to filesets without a seperate
task - maybe using the mode attribute on the fileset itself
Martin - how does your implementation perform the merging ? Do you merge t
Hi,
I just notice that delay-sign task is broken in (31/12 nightly). Don't know
how about 0.84 release - could someone confirm?
from DelaySignTask.cs was deleted propety exename which defaults to "sn.exe"
and instead value from .config file is taken as default. But in distributed
.config is no s
Another approach to do the same ;-) If you prefer this, I could do it and
send patch.
Now I already finished mine original idea with multiple s. I could
send a patch if you like that approach...
Martin
> How about a task? Like this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It would take either "replace" the f
How about a task? Like this:
It would take either "replace" the f1 with the contents of , "add"
new items or "delete" matching items.
Jarek
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:13 P
Hi all,
this snippet:
is currently not possible because type definitions are allowed only at
project or task level. Is it intended or should we allow this as well?
I'm working on extension that will allow this:
that means - ext
Hi all !
1/
Do you think, that now is good time to some
cleaning and restructuring in solution task as we discussed earlier?
I have some spare time and appetite to do that
now!
2/
Also I would need (and like to) make some
improvements to that task. What I need (and currently use not-com
Hmm
Verbose property is used as well for another purporse. This adds even more
verbosity and is dedicated more to debugging then anything else. Still
verbose could be better if it's made more-level switch rather than
true/false...
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAI
12 matches
Mail list logo
