- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Giuseppe Greco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NAnt Developers"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev]
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Mastracci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nant-Developers (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Nightly task docs broken
> Looks like the nightly task docs broke at some point-
>
> http://nant.sourceforge.n
Looks like the nightly task docs broke at some point-
http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/help/
"You don't have permission to access /nightly/help/index.html on this
server."
Permissions issue with SCP?
Matt.
---
The SF.Net email is sponsore
Gert Driesen wrote:
Giuseppe can always first download the stylesheet to his local filesystem
using the task. This has the advantage that he's able to set both
proxy and authentication information for fetching the file and it would also
increase performance for subsequent transformations.
sur
I still haven't got any firm ideas on now to handle Nant data types like
filesets etc. I'd really like to be able to use them.
- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- http://www.monash.net
- +61 (414) 610141
-
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig
Hi Stefan,
It is, in fact I spoke to Ian about it last week and he pointed me at
your blog entries on the subject. I think its about time NAnt had this
capability. Can you recall the justifications made for the element?
- Mitch Denny
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
I still think we should use xml merging (of both child nodes and attributes,
not only child nodes) for all types and not deal with filsets differently
...
I also don't think we should actually initialize the global types when we
initialize the project, I think we should only merge the xml of the t
Some small remarks :
1. I'm not sure there should be a Verbosity property on Element, why do you
think there should be one ?
2. Why did you rename the Verbose property of Project to X__Verbose ?
3. I think we should come up with a better name instead of Verbosity, no ?
Other than that it looks
Gert, Ian, Scott - how you like this patch? Do you think it is submittable?
I also found some minor bugs from mine previous mail. Here it is patched
(patch against anon-cvs from 15/01)
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Aliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "! nant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here it is. I also react to Gert's notes inline...
Also is attached mine test build script.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >What do you think? Should I prepare patch for it?
> sure. I'd like to see it.
>
> Ian
- Original Message -
From:
Sorry for coming late tgo the discussion, but the original request
sounds a lot like Ant's new [1] task.
Stefan
Footnotes:
[1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/macrodef.html
--
http://stefanbodewig.blogger.de/
---
The SF.Net email is
11 matches
Mail list logo