Gert Driesen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Mastracci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Mastracci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: ResGen assembly references?
<>Matthew Mastracci wrote:
After upgradi
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Mastracci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Mastracci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: ResGen assembly references?
> I suppose a solution might be adding a framework property
Hi all,
Actually, NAnt doucmentation is organized like this:
Does that and that...
Parameters:
+---+--+-+--+
| Attribute | Type | Description | Required |
+---+--+-+--+
| debug | bool | bla bla... | false|
+
Hi Ian,
Attached to this email you'll find the IldasmTask.cs
file... I've just corrected the file name in the
header (it was IlasmTask.cs instead of IldasmTask.cs)
and inserted an empty line after some methods because
it was missing.
I know, I'm a perfectionist and I'm sorry... The changes
have b
Gert Driesen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Nant-Developers (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] checking task availability
To be able to use this in our
Just to add a comment to this discussion...
> Well, CheckAvailability would perform the actual runtime
> check (using the XML configuration in the NAnt configuration
> file, or the behaviour specified by the task), and possibly
> throw an exception detailing the reason why the task is not
>
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Nant-Developers (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] checking task availability
> Gert Driesen wrote:
>
> >After giving it some mo
Giuseppe Greco wrote:
Ian,
The ILASM and ILDASM tasks are ready. I'll send them
to you with a separate email.
cool. I already committed ilasm.cs with couple of minor fixes. I'll just
merge in the differences from your update.
Ildasm will go in NAnt.MSTasks rather than NAnt.DotNetTasks as there
Ian,
The ILASM and ILDASM tasks are ready. I'll send them
to you with a separate email.
About the "rebuild" property... we could rename it to
"redisassemble", but I don't think this name is very nice.
In this context, "rebuild" means rebuild the IL output,
so I think it could be fine.
Let me kn
