Gert,
My implementation of the task is extremely limited, but it exactly fits
our requirements :-) It would need to be reworked to fit the broader
requirements of the community before being released, of course.
Notwithstanding, you are right in that the task shouldn't be just
dropped in without
I think both are cases of inter-task communication. IMO current nant is
totally missing such communication. errorproperty proposal is very limited
implementation of such communication. I'd rather prefer making something
more robust enabling more advanced scenarios like examining what failed or
what
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Pupek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Numit2 and .Nunit files
> We may be willing to add this support ourselves. What is the protocol for
> submitting changes?
The
Troy,
I think we first need to come to an agreement on whether its a good idea to
add a try-catch task, or whether to go for the errorproperty implementation.
I don't think it's a good idea to implement both.
Your task implementation is a bit limited, the ant-contrib task is more
powerful. I th
Matthew Mastracci wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 20:12, Ian MacLean wrote:
Matthew Mastracci wrote:
Strange - I had the same issue while I was developing (turned out that
the DirectoryScanner was busted), but the fix for that was checked in.
Where was the fix ? Maybe its manifesting
Matthew,
The new behaviour more closely follows the documentation, and as you say
this becomes consistent with handling of files... but any build files
relying on the old behaviour will of course break.
The fix is simple, to replace "**/*" with "*/**/*", but it may be hard
to diagnose if/when upgr
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 20:12, Ian MacLean wrote:
> Matthew Mastracci wrote:
>
> >Strange - I had the same issue while I was developing (turned out that
> >the DirectoryScanner was busted), but the fix for that was checked in.
> >
> >
> Where was the fix ? Maybe its manifesting itself in another
I'm not sure about a try-catch task, but I found that a try-finally task
(attached... the implementation is the obvious one, which seems to work)
greatly improved the apparent intent of my build file for a
clearcase-export target (Needed only because clearcase doesn't actually
support the idea of
Bugs item #987484, was opened at 2004-07-08 18:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=987484&group_id=31650
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
P
Hi,
I wonder if we should ask a task to NAnt(Contrib), similar to
what AntContrib has : http://ant-contrib.sourceforge.net/tasks/trycatch.html
Can anybody come up with a better alternative ?
Gert
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat
Bugs item #987471, was opened at 2004-07-08 18:29
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=987471&group_id=31650
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
P
Bugs item #968278, was opened at 2004-06-07 18:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=968278&group_id=31650
Category: Tasks
Group: 0.85
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Sub
Bugs item #932073, was opened at 2004-04-09 01:01
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=932073&group_id=31650
Category: Tasks
Group: cvs
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Subm
Bugs item #944487, was opened at 2004-04-29 15:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=944487&group_id=31650
Category: Tasks
Group: 0.85
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Sub
Bugs item #987438, was opened at 2004-07-08 19:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=987438&group_id=31650
Category: Tasks
Group: 0.85
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Bruce,
I don't modify the configuration file - so I can't help you there.
Here is the code that I use:
for each unit test assembly,
Bugs item #987438, was opened at 2004-07-08 11:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by chudq
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=987438&group_id=31650
Category: Tasks
Group: 0.85
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submit
Bugs item #987438, was opened at 2004-07-08 11:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=987438&group_id=31650
Category: Tasks
Group: 0.85
Status: Open
Resolution: None
To all NAnt developers and users,
I'm trying to use the NUnit2 task to test VB.NET code during my build. I've
tried several different routes to get the task to work with no success. I
don't really understand the documentation when it sais, "you must add the
following node to your test config file"
19 matches
Mail list logo
