Hi,
* Troy Laurin wrote on 13.07.2004 (09:24):
Sascha Andres wrote:
Added above line. Deleted too much, and don't wanted to use
undo after I wrote all of the text ;)
can be accessed from all tasks. The last function adds a protected
object to the store only readable from a task of the same
Hi,
* Troy Laurin wrote on 13.07.2004 (10:17):
Are you suggesting using the namespace for the class implementing the
task, when referencing the task in the build file? This seems like it
could be excessively verbose, to me.
Well, I always use a short namespace. So I actually don't
thought
Bugs item #944487, was opened at 2004-04-29 15:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rvf148
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=944487group_id=31650
Category: Tasks
Group: 0.85
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
-Original Message-
From: Gert Driesen
I definitely agree with you here ... But I'm also convinced
that this is not something we can/should implement right now.
Our focus right now is to get a stable NAnt 0.85 released.
It would ofcourse be interesting if someone could write a
Hi,
* Troy Laurin wrote on 13.07.2004 (15:57):
Defining namespace in the class defining the task is an interesting idea
and a possible solution... it's worth comparing this with the other
viable solutions to see what's the best solution, both in terms of
functionality as well as correctness
Hi,
here is a new task. Generally it's a task to measure the
time between two calls of it.
-sa
--
sa at programmers-world dot com http://www.livingit.de
Internet sites:
http://www.not2long.net - Make long links short
Boomarks online: http://www.mobile-bookmarks.info
using System;
using
Hi Todd,
You are right this should execute correctly and you have found a bug. I
ran out of time trying to fix it this morning but I will try to get it
in tonight.
Cheers,
Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Todd Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 12, 2004 12:44 PM
To:
